<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org">
<title>Archives of Otolaryngology current issue</title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org</link>
<description>Archives of Otolaryngology - Head &amp; Neck Surgery provides timely information for physicians and scientists concerned with diseases of the head and neck.  Published monthly, it includes peer-reviewed clinical and basic research from an array of disciplines. Archives is the official publication for the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc., the American Head and Neck Society, and the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology.</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>Apr  1 2008 12:00:00:000AM</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0886-4470</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/349-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/355?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/363?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/369?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/370?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/380?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/389?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/394?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/403?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/408?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/415?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/419?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/424?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/429?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/434?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/437?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/442?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/443?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/444?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/446?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/447?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/448?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/448-a?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif">
<title>Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery</title>
<url>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/icons/misc/titlereprint.gif</url>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/349?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THE COVER: Monarch at Monticello, Charlottesville, Virginia]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/349?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.349</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THE COVER: Monarch at Monticello, Charlottesville, Virginia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>349</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About the Cover</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/349-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ANNOUNCEMENT: Call for Photographs]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/349-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.349-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ANNOUNCEMENT: Call for Photographs]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>349</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>349</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Announcement</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/350?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/350?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ABOUT THIS JOURNAL: About This Journal]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>350</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>350</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>About This Journal</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/355?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Modulation of Cellular Invasion by VEGF-C Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/355?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine how vascular endothelial growth factor C (VEGF-C) affects tumor cell invasion and motility in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> A molecular biology study. The VEGF-C coding sequence was cloned into an expression vector and stably transfected into the SCCHN cell line SCC116 to create the SCC116-VEGFC line. RNA interference (RNAi) was used to block VEGF-C expression. An adenoviral system for expressing VEGF-C RNAi was developed and tested.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> An academic hospital laboratory.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Relative VEGF-C RNA levels were determined by real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase&ndash;polymerase chain reaction, and protein expression was evaluated by Western blot. Cellular invasion was evaluated by 24-hour semipermeable membrane transit assay.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> SCC116-VEGFC cells had markedly increased expression of VEGF-C protein and RNA compared with normal SCC116 controls. SCC116-VEGFC cells produced marked increases in cellular invasion and motility compared with SCC116 cells. Blockade of VEGF-C expression by transfection of a VEGF-C RNAi expression plasmid into both SCC116 and SCC116-VEGFC cells induced a 38% decrease in SCCHN invasion and motility as tested by a semipermeable membrane invasion assay. We developed an adenoviral expression system for VEGF-C RNAi, which also induced a dose-dependent decrease in cellular invasion in the highly invasive DM12 cell line.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> These studies demonstrate that intracellular VEGF-C levels modulate in vitro SCCHN motility and invasion. Further work is needed to clarify the specific receptors and signaling pathways that are involved in SCCHN motility. Molecular therapies that inhibit the VEGF-C pathway may have clinical potential in the treatment of lymphatic metastasis in SCCHN.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bock, J. M., Sinclair, L. L., Bedford, N. S., Jackson, R. E., Lee, J. H., Trask, D. K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Neoplasms of Head & Neck]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.355</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Modulation of Cellular Invasion by VEGF-C Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>362</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>355</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/363?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Expression of p53 and Bcl-xL as Predictive Markers for Larynx Preservation in Advanced Laryngeal Cancer]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/363?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To assess tumor markers in advanced laryngeal cancer.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Marker expression and clinical outcome.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Pretreatment tumor biopsy specimens were analyzed from patients enrolled in the Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Expression of p53 (OMIM <inter-ref locator-type="OMIM" locator="tp53">TP53</inter-ref>) and Bcl-xL (OMIM <inter-ref locator-type="OMIM" locator="600039">600039</inter-ref>) in pretreatment biopsy specimens was assessed for correlation with chemotherapy response, laryngeal preservation, and survival.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Higher rates of larynx preservation were observed in patients whose tumors expressed p53 vs those that did not (80% [36 of 45 patients] vs 59% [24 of 41 patients], <I>P</I>&nbsp;=.03). Higher rates of larynx preservation were also observed in patients whose tumors expressed low levels of Bcl-xL vs high levels of Bcl-xL (90% [18 of 20 patients] vs 60% [30 of 50 patients], <I>P</I>&nbsp;=.02). Patients were categorized into 3 risk groups (low, intermediate, and high) based on their tumor p53 and Bcl-xL expression status. Patients whose tumors had the high-risk biomarker profile (low p53 expression and high Bcl-xL expression) were less likely to preserve their larynx than patients whose tumors had the intermediate-risk biomarker profile (high p53 expression and low or high Bcl-xL expression) or the low-risk biomarker profile (low p53 expression and low Bcl-xL expression). The larynx preservation rates were 100% (10 of 10 patients), 77% (26 of 34 patients), and 54% (7 of 13 patients) for the low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups, respectively (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=.04, Fisher exact test).</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> Tumor expression of p53 and Bcl-xL is a strong predictor of successful larynx preservation in patients treated with induction chemotherapy and followed by radiation therapy in responding tumors.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kumar, B., Cordell, K. G., D'Silva, N., Prince, M. E., Adams, M. E., Fisher, S. G., Wolf, G. T., Carey, T. E., Bradford, C. R.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Pathology of Head & Neck, Radiation Therapy, Prognosis/ Outcomes, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.363</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Expression of p53 and Bcl-xL as Predictive Markers for Larynx Preservation in Advanced Laryngeal Cancer]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>369</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>363</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/369?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Error in Byline in: Keratinocyte Growth Factor and Autocrine Repair in Airway Epithelium]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/369?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.369</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CORRECTION: Error in Byline in: Keratinocyte Growth Factor and Autocrine Repair in Airway Epithelium]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>369</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>369</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/370?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Five-Year Survival Rates and Time Trends of Laryngeal Cancer in the US Population]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/370?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To provide comprehensive temporal trend analysis of 5-year relative survival rates of laryngeal cancer using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database; and to expand on prior reports by including inclusion of laryngeal tumor location, stage, age at diagnosis, treatment strategy, and histologic grade.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective cohort analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database of the National Cancer Institute. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data were used to design 5 cohorts of patients with laryngeal cancer: 1977-1978, 1983-1984, 1989-1990, 1995-1996, and 2001-2002. Five-year survival rates were analyzed according to tumor site, stage, and grade; age at diagnosis; and treatment strategy. The joinpoint regression model was used to assess survival trends and their statistical significance.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Among patients with supraglottic cancer, 5-year relative survival rates for distant disease worsened over time while rates for local and regional disease did not change (<I>P&nbsp;</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01 and <I>P&nbsp;</I>>&nbsp;.05, respectively). For localized glottic cancer, survival remained stable from 1977-1978 to 2001-2002. However, patients with regional and distant glottic cancer demonstrated a significant decrease in survival in the past 3 decades (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). This trend was independent of treatment strategy. Finally, the proportion of well-differentiated tumors in patients with regional laryngeal cancer decreased over time (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001 for supraglottic and <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.007 for glottic).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A decreasing 5-year survival trend was found among patients with glottic cancer who had regional disease and in all patients with distant disease. Histopathologic trends not previously reported in those with laryngeal cancer seem to parallel those seen in other tobacco-related cancers. These trends may reflect the effect of birth cohorts and implicate the relationship between carcinogenic exposure and host factors, rather than the influence of treatment.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cosetti, M., Yu, G.-P., Schantz, S. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Public Health, Tobacco, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.370</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Five-Year Survival Rates and Time Trends of Laryngeal Cancer in the US Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>379</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>370</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/380?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Prognostic Indicators of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/380?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To determine the possible prognostic indicators of unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) and survey the timing and values of preset laryngeal electromyography (LEMG) rules for UVFP.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Cohort study with retrospective data analysis.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Voice clinic of a tertiary medical center.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Complete data for 45 patients diagnosed with idiopathic or iatrogenic UVFP. The LEMG was performed between 3 weeks and 6 months from the onset of symptoms.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> At least 6 months after symptom onset and 3 months after LEMG.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Thirteen subjects showed resolved vocal fold motion (29%), and 32 had persistent vocal fold paralysis (71%). According to the LEMG decision rules proposed by Munin et al in 2003, the predictive values for positive results, negative results, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LEMG were 78.9%, 71.4%, 93.8%, 38.5%, and 77.8%, respectively. We found the false-positive rate to be as high as 50% if LEMG was performed less than 2 months after symptom onset, and only 7.7% if LEMG was performed at least 2 months after symptom onset. After excluding 14 LEMG data recorded at less than 2 months, the predictive values for positive results, negative results, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LEMG were 92.3%, 60%, 92.3%, 60.0%, and 87.1%, respectively. The predictive values of positive results and accuracy significantly improved without compromising sensitivity.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> This study confirms that LEMG is a clinically useful tool that can offer prognostic information for UVFP especially if it is done at least 2 months after symptom onset.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, C.-C., Chang, M.-H., Wang, C.-P., Liu, S.-A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology, Prognosis/ Outcomes]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.380</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Prognostic Indicators of Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>388</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>380</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/389?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Temporomandibular Disorder and New Aural Symptoms]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/389?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To report the prevalence and demographics of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) within a population of clinic patients and to describe the prevalence of revisited and new, previously unstudied, aural symptoms described by a sample of these patients with TMD (hereinafter "TMD patients").</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> A retrospective evaluation of patient records was completed to determine the percentage and the demographics of TMD patients in a clinical setting. A prospective analysis was done on the self-reported prevalence of previously studied and new aural symptoms of 78 TMD study patients compared with 78 control patients without TMD.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> A private otolaryngology practice in a rural Arizona town.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Patients with TMD and aural symptoms.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Ten percent of all new otolaryngology clinic patients were diagnosed as having TMD. Of the 78 patients, 27 (35%) listed the ear as one of their sites of pain. The prevalence of each of the 8 aural symptoms assessed was significantly higher in TMD patients compared with controls (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). A warm and/or fluid sensation in the ear and a stuffed cotton sensation in the ear were the most indicative symptoms of TMD because they had the highest relative risk ratios in TMD patients. Aural symptoms of loud noise sensitivity and cold air/wind sensitivity are also relevant and were approximately 5 times more frequent in TMD subjects than in controls.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Patients with TMD are a significant component of otolaryngology practice. There are previously uninvestigated aural symptoms that occur much more frequently in TMD patients than in patients without TMD.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cox, K. W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Headache, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Middle/ External Ear Disorders, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other, Pain, Women's Health, Women's Health, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.389</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Temporomandibular Disorder and New Aural Symptoms]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>393</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>389</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/394?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Subjective Visual Vertical and Horizontal: Effect of the Preset Angle]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/394?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> (1) To study the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective visual horizontal (SVH) in patients with long-standing unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction (PVD) and unilateral M&eacute;ni&egrave;re's disease (MD) compared with controls. (2) To study the relationship between the direction of deviation of the linear marker (preset angle) and measures of SVV and SVH values.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective case-control study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Outpatient clinic in a tertiary neuro-otology department.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Seventeen healthy volunteers (mean age, 35.5 years), 9 patients with PVD (mean age, 43.1 years), and 10 patients with MD (mean age, 50.7 years) were included in the analysis.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> All subjects had a detailed neuro-otological evaluation. Twelve replicate readings of SVV and SVH were taken for each subject, with random preset angles, 6 in the clockwise and 6 in the counterclockwise direction.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> The SVV and SVH values were correlated with clinical features and the direction of the preset angle.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The 2 subjects with PVD who had abnormal mean SVV and SVH values had symptoms of dysequilibrium and otolithic involvement. The 5 patients in the MD group who had abnormal mean SVV and SVH values had either recent acute vertiginous attacks or total canal paresis on the affected side. A previously unreported finding, to our knowledge, is that the SVV value depends on the direction of the preset angle in all subject groups, more so in the PVD and MD groups compared with controls. The SVV is inclined toward the direction of the preset angle. A weaker relation is seen between the SVH and preset angle.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> The preset angle should be considered when comparing SVV and SVH values.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pagarkar, W., Bamiou, D.-E., Ridout, D., Luxon, L. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Balance Disorders, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.394</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Subjective Visual Vertical and Horizontal: Effect of the Preset Angle]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>401</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>394</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/403?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: A Novel SLC26A4 (PDS) Deafness Mutation Retained in the Endoplasmic Reticulum]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/403?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objectives&nbsp;</b> To identify mutations in the <I>SLC26A4</I> gene in individuals with nonsyndromic hearing loss and enlarged vestibular aqueduct, to design a predicted model of the pendrin protein, and to characterize novel mutations by means of localization in mammalian cells and effect of the mutation on the predicted model.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Validation of the mutation by its exclusion in more than 300 individuals with normal hearing.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> A laboratory of genetics of hearing loss research, clinical genetics laboratories, an otolaryngology department at Tel Aviv University, and medical centers in Israel.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A patient with nonsyndromic hearing loss and enlarged vestibular aqueduct, 203 deaf probands, and 310 controls with normal hearing.</p>
<p><b>Interventions&nbsp;</b> Sequencing the <I>SLC26A4</I> gene in the patient with nonsyndromic hearing loss and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Transfection of yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) constructs into mammalian COS7 cells. Designing a computational model of the human SLC26A4 protein.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measure&nbsp;</b> Detection of a novel c.1458_1459insT <I>SLC26A4</I> mutation.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> A computational model of the human pendrin protein suggests that the novel c.1458_1459insT mutation leads to a prematurely truncated protein, p.Ile487TyrfsX39. Mammalian COS7 cells transfected with the YFP-1458_1459insT construct showed mislocalization of the mutant protein.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> A novel <I>SLC26A4</I> mutation was detected in Israel. Because current estimates demonstrate that <I>SLC26A4</I> mutations are involved in up to 4% of nonsyndromic deafness, our findings emphasize the importance of adding a molecular test for the <I>SLC26A4</I> gene in the diagnosis of deafness, particularly when bone abnormalities are involved, to the list of genes screened in Israel and elsewhere in the world.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brownstein, Z. N., Dror, A. A., Gilony, D., Migirov, L., Hirschberg, K., Avraham, K. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neurology, Neuro-otology, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Genetics of Head & Neck Disease, Hearing Loss/ Deafness, Genetics, Genetic Disorders]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.403</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: A Novel SLC26A4 (PDS) Deafness Mutation Retained in the Endoplasmic Reticulum]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>407</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>403</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/408?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Pediatric Mediastinitis as a Complication of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Retropharyngeal Abscess]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/408?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To examine changes in the incidence, bacteriology, and complications of retropharyngeal infection (RPI) over an 8-year period.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective medical record review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary children's hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> The study population comprised 108 patients younger than 18 years old.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Medical record review of patients with a discharge diagnosis of RPI (<I>International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision</I> code 478.24).</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Cases from June 1997 to May 2001 were compared with those from June 2001 to May 2005 to examine changes in the incidence, bacteriology, and complications of RPI.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The number of RPI cases doubled from 36 to 72 in the final 4 years. In the first 4 years, no isolates of methicillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (MRSA) were found, and 1 patient developed mediastinitis. In the last 4 years, 8 of 25 patients (32%) with positive cultures had MRSA isolated, and 7 cases of mediastinitis occurred. Of the 8 children with cultures positive for MRSA, 6 developed mediastinitis. The median age for all children with RPI was 32.5 months (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;108). The median age for children with MRSA and mediastinitis was 6.5 months (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;8) and 5.5 months (n&nbsp;=&nbsp;8), respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> An alarming increase in the number of RPI cases occurred over the final 4 years. Methicillin-resistant <I>S aureus</I> is now a significant pathogen in patients with RPI at our institution. Documented local increases in community-associated MRSA infections and universal sensitivity to clindamycin suggest that community-associated MRSA is responsible for the change in bacteriology. A high correlation exists between MRSA infection and mediastinitis. Patients with MRSA infections are younger and may be vulnerable to developing mediastinitis because of immature immune systems. A higher index of suspicion is needed for MRSA, especially in patients younger than 1 year.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wright, C. T., Stocks, R. M. S., Armstrong, D. L., Arnold, S. R., Gould, H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Bacterial Infections, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other, Drug Therapy, Drug Therapy, Other, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.408</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Pediatric Mediastinitis as a Complication of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Retropharyngeal Abscess]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>413</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>408</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/415?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: The Role of Airway Fluoroscopy in the Evaluation of Children With Stridor]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/415?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To determine the sensitivity and specificity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of pediatric laryngotracheal abnormalities.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Retrospective chart review.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary care children's hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Thirty-nine children, with a mean age of 18 months at the time of evaluation, were evaluated for stridor.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Diagnoses made by airway fluoroscopy and endoscopy. The medical records of patients who had undergone both airway fluoroscopy and airway endoscopy for the evaluation of stridor over a 5-year period were reviewed. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis at any level, and airway mass lesions were determined using endoscopic evaluation as the "gold standard."</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Twenty-three of 39 patients (59%) received a different diagnosis by airway endoscopy than by airway fluoroscopy. The sensitivity of airway fluoroscopy in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and an airway mass was 27%, 20%, 69%, and 43%, respectively. The specificity for the same diagnoses was 100%, 94%, 100%, and 100%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Airway fluoroscopy appears to be reliable in the diagnosis of laryngomalacia, tracheomalacia, airway stenosis, and airway masses because of its high specificity. However, its sensitivity in detecting these common causes of stridor is poor. Negative fluoroscopic study results require further diagnostic evaluation if the clinical indication exists; therefore, the value of fluoroscopy as a screening tool remains uncertain.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Berg, E., Naseri, I., Sobol, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Airway Obstruction, Endoscopy of Upper Aerodigestive Tract, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Radiologic Imaging, Diagnosis, Radiologic Imaging, Other]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.415</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: The Role of Airway Fluoroscopy in the Evaluation of Children With Stridor]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>418</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>415</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/419?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Effect of Septoplasty on Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/419?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To measure the effect of septoplasty on the volume of inferior turbinate in patients with a deviated nasal septum.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> In this retrospective analysis, patients who underwent septoplasty without turbinate surgery from May 1, 2003, through April 30, 2006, were studied. The thicknesses and cross-sectional areas of mucosa and conchal bones were measured with computed tomography before the operations and at least 1 year after the operations.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> University hospital.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> A total of 20 patients who presented with a chief concern of nasal obstruction.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> The thicknesses of the medial mucosa, bone, and lateral mucosa and the cross-sectional area of turbinate before and after septoplasty were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05 was considered statistically significant.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The medial mucosa and cross-sectional area of the inferior turbinate on the concave side of the septum were significantly decreased by septoplasty (both, <I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01), and the medial mucosa and cross-sectional area of the inferior turbinate on the convex side of the septum were significantly increased by septoplasty (<I>P</I>&nbsp;=&nbsp;.01). The thicknesses and cross-sectional areas of the conchal bone on the concave and convex sides of the septum were not affected by septoplasty.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> After septoplasty, inferior turbinate hypertrophy, especially in the medial mucosa, may reverse.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, D. H., Park, H. Y., Kim, H. S., Kang, S. O., Park, J. S., Han, N. S., Kim, H. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, General Rhinology, Facial Plastic Surgery, Nasal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.419</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Effect of Septoplasty on Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>423</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>419</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/424?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Infection Rate and Virus-Induced Cytokine Secretion in Experimental Rhinovirus Infection in Mucosal Organ Culture: Comparison Between Specimens From Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps and Those From Normal Subjects]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/424?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To investigate the difference in susceptibility to rhinovirus (RV) infection and RV-induced inflammatory response between the nasal mucosae from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRS/NP) and subjects without CRS/NP (hereinafter, normal subjects).</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> In vitro study.</p>
<p><b>Setting&nbsp;</b> Tertiary care rhinology clinic.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> We conducted RV infection experiments on the organ cultures of NPs and inferior turbinate mucosae from 16 patients with CRS/NP and sphenoid sinus and inferior turbinate mucosae from 19 patients who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary surgery.</p>
<p><b>Main Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Successful RV-16 infection was determined by positive identification of RV on the surface fluid of organ culture using seminested reverse transcriptase&ndash;polymerase chain reaction. Effects of RV on interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-8 secretion were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> The successful RV infection was achievable in 9 of 16 NP samples (56.3%) and 9 of 16 turbinate samples (56.3%) from patients with CRS/NP compared with 11 of 19 sphenoid sinus samples (57.9%) and 15 of 19 turbinate samples (78.9%) from normal subjects. The RV infection increased IL-6 and IL-8 secretion 236% and 173%, respectively, in NP samples, and 218% and 178%, respectively, in turbinate samples from patients with CRS/NP; compared with 231% and 145%, respectively, in sphenoid mucosa samples, and 181% and 148%, respectively, in turbinate samples from normal subjects. However, there were no statistical differences among the 4 groups.</p>
<p><b>Conclusion&nbsp;</b> These in vitro findings suggest that subjects with CRS/NP mucosa might not be more susceptible to RV infection, and did not secrete more cytokines in response to rhinovirus infection, than those with normal mucosa.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, J. H., Kwon, H. J., Chung, Y.-S., Lee, B.-J., Jang, Y. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Viral Infections, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, General Rhinology, Paranasal Sinus Disease, Infectious Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.424</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Infection Rate and Virus-Induced Cytokine Secretion in Experimental Rhinovirus Infection in Mucosal Organ Culture: Comparison Between Specimens From Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps and Those From Normal Subjects]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>427</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>424</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/429?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Improvement in Quality of Life After Nasal Surgery Alone for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Nasal Obstruction]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/429?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>Objective&nbsp;</b> To evaluate the impact of nasal surgery alone on quality of life (QOL) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and nasal obstruction using generic and disease-specific QOL questionnaires.</p>
<p><b>Design&nbsp;</b> Prospective, longitudinal cohort study.</p>
<p><b>Patients&nbsp;</b> Fifty-one consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea (50 men and 1 woman; mean age, 39 years; mean [SD] apnea-hypopnea index, 37.4 [28.9] events/h; and mean&nbsp;&plusmn;&nbsp;SD body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 26.0 [3.5]) with symptoms of nasal obstruction due to a deviated nasal septum.</p>
<p><b>Intervention&nbsp;</b> Septomeatoplasty.</p>
<p><b>Outcome Measures&nbsp;</b> Surgical outcomes were measured using the Snore Outcomes Survey, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) 3 months after surgery. We compared baseline and postoperative scores. Normative SF-36 data obtained from 4591 age- and sex-matched adults were used as references.</p>
<p><b>Results&nbsp;</b> Nasal obstruction symptoms significantly improved (mean [SD] visual analog scale score, &ndash;5.2 [1.4]; <I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001). Assessments also showed significant improvement in the Snore Outcomes Survey (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.001) scores and 6 of the 8 SF-36 subscale scores (<I>P</I>&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;.05). Remarkable improvements were observed in disease-specific Snore Outcomes Survey (by 43.1%), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (by 27.3%), and generic SF-36 role-emotional (by 30.4%) and role-physical (by 20.7%) QOL subscales. The postoperative role-emotional, bodily pain, and social function dimensions of health were indistinguishable from referential population data (<I>P</I>&nbsp;>&nbsp;.05).</p>
<p><b>Conclusions&nbsp;</b> Correction of an obstructed nasal airway significantly improves disease-specific and generic QOL in adult patients with obstructive sleep apnea who also have nasal obstruction symptoms. After nasal surgery, patients may experience greater improvement in snoring and daytime sleepiness than in other generic health status. Our findings substantiate the role of nasal surgery in treating patients with obstructive sleep apnea and nasal obstruction.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Li, H.-Y., Lin, Y., Chen, N.-H., Lee, L.-A., Fang, T.-J., Wang, P.-C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, General Rhinology, Sleep Apnea, Quality of Life, Surgery, Surgical Interventions, Surgical Interventions, Other, Facial Plastic Surgery, Nasal Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.429</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Improvement in Quality of Life After Nasal Surgery Alone for Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Nasal Obstruction]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>433</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>429</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Original Article</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/434?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL NOTE: Adolescent Tracheobronchomalacia: Double Aortic Arches Revisited]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/434?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanna, N., Joshi, A. S., Sidell, D., Shah, R. K., Preciado, D. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Congenital Anomalies of Head & Neck, Pediatric Otolaryngology, Pediatrics, Adolescent Medicine, Congenital Malformations, Facial Plastic Surgery, Pediatric Facial Plastic Surgery]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.434</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL NOTE: Adolescent Tracheobronchomalacia: Double Aortic Arches Revisited]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>436</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>434</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/437?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL NOTE: Proliferative Myositis: A Rare Pseudomalignant Tumor of the Head and Neck]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/437?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fauser, C., Nahrig, J., Niedermeyer, H. P., Arnold, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.437</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL NOTE: Proliferative Myositis: A Rare Pseudomalignant Tumor of the Head and Neck]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>440</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>437</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Note</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/442?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 1]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/442?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott, A. R., Holbrook, E. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Radiology of Head & Neck, Diagnosis, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.442</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 1]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>442</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>442</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/443?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 2]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/443?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kamath, A., Nagarajan, G., Kulkarni, A. V., Kulkarni, S., Deshpande, M. S., D'cruz, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.443</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 2]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>443</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>443</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/444?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 1: Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/444?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Radiology of Head & Neck, Diagnosis, Endocrine Diseases, Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.444</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 1: Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>444</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>444</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/445?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 2: Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/445?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Radiology of Head & Neck, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.445</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: RADIOLOGY: Radiology Quiz Case 2: Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>445</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>445</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Radiology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/446?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 1]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/446?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aouad, R., Matar, N., Sader-Ghorra, C., Haddad, A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Pathology of Head & Neck, Salivary Gland Disorders, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.446</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 1]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>446</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>446</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Pathology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/447?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 2]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/447?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenner, M. J., Perrin, R. J., Uppaluri, R., Zipfel, G. J., Lewis, J. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Pathology of Head & Neck, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.447</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 2]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>447</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>447</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Pathology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/448?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 1: Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/448?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Pathology of Head & Neck, Salivary Gland Disorders, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.448-a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 1: Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>448</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>448</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Pathology</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/448-a?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 2: Diagnosis]]></title>
<link>http://archotol.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/short/134/4/448-a?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-04-21</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Oncology, Head & Neck Cancer, Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Neoplasms of Head & Neck, Pathology of Head & Neck, Diagnosis]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1001/archotol.134.4.448-b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROBLEM SOLVING: PATHOLOGY: Pathology Quiz Case 2: Diagnosis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Medical Association</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>134</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>449</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>448</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Clinical Problem Solving: Pathology</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>