You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 96 No. 3, September 1972 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

MICHEL'S DEAFNESS-Reply

MICHAEL M. PAPARELLA, MD
Department of Otolaryngology University of Minnesota Minneapolis 55455

Arch Otolaryngol. 1972;96(3):290.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I am pleased to answer Dr. Potter's letter as it provides another opportunity to stress a point made in our article on "Mondini's Deafness," mainly that radiographic-tomographic studies, although useful diagnostic tools, cannot be equated to histological studies in terms of reliability.

So-called Michel's deafness is a genetic congenital lesion characterized by complete lack of the bony and membranous labyrinth and it is true that "the only recent histological (so as not to be taken out of context) description of complete aplasia (Michel's) occurred as a result of thalidomide poisoning" and was obviously therefore not genetically induced.

I suggest the case Dr. Potter described as an example of Michel deformity is unproven. In his summary he describes "a case of complete absence of the inner ear (Michel deformity) is presented," while in the preceding case description (page 603), he says "the vestibule and lateral semicircular canal made up one large . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1972 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.