You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 75 No. 4, April 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  RECONSTRUCTIVE
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tracheal Prostheses

An Experimental Study in Dogs

S. DONALD GREENBERG, M.D.; RICHARD K. WILLMS, M.D.

Arch Otolaryngol. 1962;75(4):335-341.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Extensive experimental and clinical investigations which we recently reviewed1 failed to produce a satisfactory tracheal replacement. This study was made to evaluate tracheal prostheses composed of 3 different types of materials for "sleeve" reconstruction of the trachea and to observe regeneration of the respiratory epithelium. Furthermore, since continuous movement of the mucus in the tracheobronchial tree by the ciliated respiratory epithelium is of prime importance in cleansing the air passages, in vitro studies were made using graphite particles to evaluate the function of the regenerated epithelium.

Method

We selected 21 large dogs weighing 12 kg. or more because the diameter of their tracheas approximates that of man. The operations were performed under intravenous anesthesia, using pentobarbital (Nembutal), 30 mg. per kilogram.

Group 1.—In eleven dogs, celiotomy was performed, and a portion of polyethylene plastic (Marlex) mesh, 6x6 cm., was sutured into the greater omentum. The Marlex mesh was removed . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

HOUSTON, TEXAS

From the Department of Pathology and the Cora and Webb Mading Department of Surgery, Baylor University College of Medicine, and the Veterans Administration Hospital.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Nov. 9, 1961.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1962 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.