You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 62 No. 3, September 1955 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

THE ANTIHISTAMINES IN LATE SECONDARY HEMORRHAGE

JOSEPH J. LITTELL, M.D.
Santa Rosa, Calif.

AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1955;62(3):331-332.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Bleeding which occurs from the 3rd to the 14th day after an operation has always been a source not only of great annoyance and worry to me but also something of a mystery. Bleeding at this time is usually from a capillary bed rather than from a big vessel, has a strong tendency to recurrence over several days' time, and is difficult to control. One cannot pick up a bleeding point with a hemostat and tie it off. Caustics are sometimes helpful. Pressure on the area, especially with epinephrine, controls it as long as the epinephrine is effective and/or the pressure is maintained. But, as in the nose or the adenoid region, it is easy for a packing to slip a little or not be on the exact spot. In that case, one can expect an exasperating call to the effect that the area is bleeding again. After the 14th . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

Submitted for publication May 2, 1955.

Since the article was written, and as of Sept. 10, 1955, I have seen three cases of postoperative bleeding which required an unilateral anterior nasal pack. One was an apparently eroded spurting vessel in the incisor canal, injured when its bony surroundings were chiseled away during a submucous resection. The antihistamines could not be expected to control this. Case 2 was from a submucous resection of a lower turbinate in a profoundly allergic boy in whom the antihistamines were ineffective in reducing a tremendous vasomotor swelling. The third case showed persistent oozing from the tip of an injured middle turbinate in a man with a blood pressure of 210/114.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1955 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.