You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 38 No. 3, September 1943 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

INFLUENCE OF VESTIBULAR STIMULATION ON THE FUSION FREQUENCY OF FLICKER

IN NORMAL SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH POSTCONCUSSION SYNDROME

ERNST SIMONSON, M.D.; MEYER S. FOX, M.D.; NORBERT ENZER, M.D.

Arch Otolaryngol. 1943;38(3):245-251.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Cerebral concussion may produce subjective disturbances for a considerable period without being associated with objective clinical signs. Since dizziness is one of the most frequent complaints, it has been assumed that the vestibular apparatus is frequently affected by concussion. Vertigo as a symptom complaint is subjective. Tests for this condition (Romberg test; deviation test; finger to nose test) depend on the patient's cooperation, and their significance is often easily appreciated by the patient. These tests are difficult to apply in cases of malingering. Because of its objective nature, one of the best tests available is the nystagmus reaction to caloric stimulation. Since the nystagmus reaction may be normal in patients with considerable disturbance, the presence of a pathologic nystagmus response would indicate objective impairment, but a normal nystagmus reaction would not exclude it. The variability of the nystagmus effect may be partly due to the judgment of the observer. Hence, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

MILWAUKEE

From the Research Laboratory of Mount Sinai Hospital.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1943 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.