You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 31 No. 2, February 1940 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Notes; New Instruments and Technics
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

CORRECTION OF SADDLEBACK DEFORMITIES OF THE NOSE BY SPECIALLY CUT CARTILAGE FROM THE EAR

F. HARBERT, M.D.
PHILADELPHIA

Arch Otolaryngol. 1940;31(2):339-341.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The most common causes of saddleback deformities are abscess of the septum, too complete a submucous resection, trauma and some congenital anomalies. There is a growing and justifiable tendency to correct more moderate deformities, especially for persons in whom they cause a feeling of inferiority; but until recently only the more extreme deformities were routinely operated on. Beck and Guttman1 cautioned against operating on patients who are psychically unstable or in whom the psychic disturbance is out of proportion to a minor defect, lest the operative procedure serve as a basis for a new obsession.

The saddleback nose is one of the easiest and most satisfactory of deformities to correct. The methods and materials are varied, however. Inert transplants, such as paraffin, gold, silver, celluloid and ivory, have been practically abandoned, although there are still some staunch advocates of the use of ivory.2 The main objections are the rigidity of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

The opinions and assertions contained herein are the personal ones of the writer and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Navy Department or of the Naval Service at large.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1940 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.