You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 2, February 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cupulolithiasis and Canalolithiasis Are Two Photos of a Story Called 'The Destiny of the Otoconia'

Reza Sheikholeslam-Zadeh
Brussels, Belgium

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(2):206-207.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I was preparing my thesis for graduation from a faculty of medicine. The subject I chose was on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). I did a retrospective study of 201 cases.

I learned that it was Barany1 in 1921 who described BPPV for the first time. Dix and Hallpike2 brought further precisions and introduced the diagnostic maneuver. Schuknecht3 introduced cupulolithiasis for explaining the syndrome. Hall et al4 proposed canalolithiasis because the first theory did not explain the different characteristics of BPPV.

Some authors have compared cupulolithiasis with positional alcohol nystagmus (PAN) and since the former presents differently from PAN, they questioned the validity of cupulolithiasis. It seems that there are some differences between the two phenomena. On one hand, BPPV is a progressive phenomenon, the deposition of particles is limited to a small part of the cupula, and there is no direct central effect in cupulolithiasis. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.