I am writing to you regarding an article by Catalano and Biller that appeared in the ARCHIVES.1
The authors' claim to originality is not supported by the literature as similar procedures have already been described.2,3 For example, the descriptive similarities to our facial translocation2 procedure are too numerous to list, so a graphic comparison may suffice (Figure).
It is true that the original facial translocation was described as a separate soft-tissue and bone dissection above the palate but subsequent publications have included the palate as well as bone and soft tissue as a single flap (each hemipalate [still attached to its vascular pedicle] is then rotated laterally and retracted).4
Also, a study by Wei et al3 looks similar to the authors' article.1
Similarity of incisions and exposures. Top left, top part of figure, A and B are points at which the incisional notch is
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]