You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 12 No. 5, November 1930 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Progress in Otolaryngology

A Summary of the Bibliographic Material Available in the Field of Otolaryngology

ADVANCES IN THE FIELD OF ALLERGY AS RELATED TO OTOLARYNGOLOGY DURING THE YEARS 1929 AND 1930

W. W. DUKE, M.D.

Arch Otolaryngol. 1930;12(5):651-675.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The following review of eighty-two papers published in 1929 and 1930 shows advances in knowledge of the causes and pathogenesis of allergy, its effects and its treatment. Especially interesting are: the results of Cohen, Ecker, Breitbart and Rudolph showing that sufficient pollen substance can be absorbed from the nose to affect a passively sensitized skin site in a normal subject; the results of Parlato and of Figley proving the sensitiveness of certain persons to scales from the wings of insects; the observations of Hansel on the histopathology of allergic nasal membranes; the roentgen studies of Proetz showing a rapid gross swelling of the antral membranes during an attack of asthma, and finally improvement in methods of treatment.

ETIOLOGY AND PATHOGENESIS OF THE ALLERGY REACTION

Cohen, Ecker, Breitbart and Rudolph1 reported that by the Prausnitz and Kustner method they passively sensitized skin areas to ragweed in a large number . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

KANSAS CITY, MO.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1930 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.