 |
 |

Progress in OtolaryngologyA Summary of the Bibliographic Material Available in the Field of OtolaryngologyTHE PARANASAL CAVITIES A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE FROM OCT. 1, 1928, TO OCT. 1, 1929
D. CAMPBELL SMYTH, M.D.
Arch Otolaryngol. 1930;12(1):89-110.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The volume of literature on the sinuses during the past year is as usual abundant and also as usual contains little that is new. There may be some excuse for men in the small towns in remote sections of the country writing papers containing well known facts, but there can be no excuse for well known otolaryngologists looked up to by the medical profession continuing to write year after year papers that contain nothing that cannot be found in the most dust-covered textbooks on otolaryngology on the library shelves. The natural inference is that these men have told all that they know, but wish to continue to write.
The maxillary sinus, probably because, as Mosher once said, it is near the surface and hence easy to get at, is the one about which the most is written. Certainly this is not due to the fact that trained otolaryngologists should be
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
BOSTON
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|