This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

William Lawson, MD, DDS; Rahul K. Naidu, MD; Nabil S. Fuleihan, MD; NABIL S. FULEIHAN, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(5):540-541.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I appreciate this opportunity to discuss the article by Drs Lawson and Naidu.¹ The authors are presenting a retrospective study and a reflective assessment of the male facelifts they performed.

Previous series on male facelift surgery stressed personal techniques without in-depth analysis of long-term results and variables encountered in the male patient. Since male facelift surgery has become a more common procedure, the literature on facial plastic surgery is in need of articles that stress the experiences and results of this surgery.

See also p 535.

Lawson and Naidu stress the main differences in the cervicofacial skin between men and women. These differences should be kept in mind during the surgical planning of facelift surgery. Variations in the placement of the incision depending on different presenting clinical features is essential in a male facelift.

Hair distribution in the temple and preauricular and postauricular areas should be carefully analyzed. The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Boston, Mass

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?