You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 3, March 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Recurrent Tonsillitis: The Role of Chlamydia and Mycoplasma-Reply

LCDR DAVID R. CHARNOCK, MC
USNR

LT GAIL D. CHAPMAN, MSC
USNR

LTC ARTHUR WOZNIAK, MSC
USA

CDR ROBERT E. TAYLOR, MC
USN Rutland, Vt

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993;119(3):355-356.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—The evaluation of tonsil core tissue homgenate for Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae as an alternate method to surface culture is new, and we appreciate Dr Hammerschlag's critical review of our article and the issues raised. Howev

er, we feel that our study was indeed sound. As Dr Hammerschlag points out, there is some serologic cross-reactivity between C trachomatis and Chlamydia pneumoniae; therefore, the possibility does exist for C trachomatis to be present in tonsil core tissue. We do agree that C pneumoniae deserves further investigation. Our Navy grant proposal was formulated in 1988, prior to the designation of C pneumoniae as a new species in 1989. In addition, the commercial nonavailablility of proper controls for C pneumoniae during our study would have made it almost impossible for our laboratory to test for it.

As stated in our article, Gerber and Ryan1 "implicated," rather than supported, the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.