This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

RONALD A. CARSON, PHD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(5):496-497.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Ought belongs to the vocabulary of ethics. It specifies responsible action. To say that one ought to do something implies that one is duty bound to do it. It is not optional but obligatory. Failure to do what one ought to do is an abrogation of responsibility.

This being so, the answer to the question that titles this essay seems obvious. Surely everyone has decent health care coming, but who is "everyone"? Everyone who wants it, whether or not they need it? Everyone who needs it, irrespective of their ability to pay for it? And what constitutes decent health care? Preventive care, catastrophic care, long-term care? The ethical question as to who ought to get decent health care is a complicated one.

A system of health care provision is made up of several crucial features, notably quality, cost, and access. In keeping with the theme of this issue of the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Galveston, Tex

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?