
Is Resident Research Worth Supporting?
ARLEN D. MEYERS, MD, MBA
Denver, Colo
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117(12):1332.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS) announced its first resident research grants in 1983. Since then, nine residents have each been awarded $5000 grants. Although supporting resident research would seem intuitively worthwhile, several arguments against funding resident research have been put forward:
- Resources are too precious to be risked on inexperienced investigators.
- The AAFPRS does not have the resources to monitor the progress of research or the appropriate use of funds.
- Resident research experiences are too varied in the nation's training programs to assure consistent quality.
- The AAFPRS resident research grants may simply be devices to fund the sponsoring faculty's research.
- With all of their other responsibilities, residents do not have the time to learn and perfect research skills.
- Five thousand dollars is not enough money to support any meaningful projects.
In an effort to monitor the effectiveness of the
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|