You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 9, September 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Medical News
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Alternative to Flow Cytometry for the Study of Tumor Cell Kinetics

MARK C. WEISSLER, MD
Chapel

Hill NC

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(9):1028.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

At the 31st annual meeting of the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery held in San Francisco, Calif, April 5 and 6, 1989, Marc Coltrera, MD, and colleagues of the University of Washington, Seattle, reported on a new alternative to flow cytometry for the study of cell kinetics within tumors. They noted that earlier studies have shown a correlation between the extent of cell proliferation within a tumor and the rate of local recurrence, distant metastases, and response to radiotherapy. Using a monoclonal antibody to PCNA (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen) they compared immunoperoxidase staining of fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tumor tissue with previously obtained flow cytometric data on the same tissue. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen staining was recorded on a 1 to 4 scale depending on the proportion of cells staining the specimen. In general, a good correlation was found between the two methods. Discrepancies arose . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.