This Article  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

ROBERT H. OSSOFF, MD
Nashville, Tenn

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(2):149.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Malnourished patients with cancer of the head and neck may be adversely affected by the introduction of prospective payment according to diagnosis related groups (DRGs), a recent study shows.

Bernard S. Linn, MD, and David S. Robinson, MD, compared 59 male patients with cancer of the head and neck admitted for massive resections before the introduction of DRGs with 61 similar patients admitted after the introduction of DRGs, and classified these patients as malnourished or well nourished. The results of their study, published in JAMA (1988;260:514-518), showed that in malnourished patients, complication scores were over two times higher after the introduction of DRGs. The authors point out that currently, under the prospective payment system, there is no additional allowance for a diagnosis of malnutrition.

Their primary findings were that, after the introduction of DRGs, (1) patients have shorter lengths of stay before surgery, (2) patients are more malnourished before . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?