You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 115 No. 10, October 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Medical News
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumors of the Head and Neck

LANNY GARTH CLOSE, MD
Dallas, Tex

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1989;115(10):1161.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

At the 1989 annual meeting of the American Society for Head and Neck Surgery in San Francisco, Calif, Douglas Phillips and colleagues, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, presented their experience using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of 11 patients with neoplasms of the head and neck. All patients were studied using T1- and T2-weighted images, as well as post-gadolinium T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Gadolinium is a paramagnetic contrast agent, similar to the iodinated contrast agents used in computed tomography, and was employed to increase the sensitivity of the examination. Images obtained on each patient were scored according to tumor recognition (conspicuity) and margin delineation. The gadolinium-enhanced images were judged to be superior to both T1- and T2-weighted images in 7 of 11 patients in terms of margins, and in 6 of 11 patients in terms of conspicuity. Images obtained with gadolinium were not uniformly superior; and, in a few . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.