You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 12, December 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Medical News
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Comparative Evaluation of Amoxicillin and Cefaclor in the Treatment of Acute Otitis Media With Effusion

GEORGE H. ZALZAL, MD
Washington, DC

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114(12):1367.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

At the third annual meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Kiawah Island, SC, Dr Stanievich and colleagues, Children's Hospital, Buffalo, reported a study comparing amoxicillin to cefaclor (Ceclor) for the treatment of acute otitis media with effusion. Since cefaclor is resistant to β-lactamase inactivation, the study tried to determine if it is better than amoxicillin. Diagnosis was established by pneumatic otoscopy, tympanometry, audiometry when possible, tympanocentesis, and at least one of the following symptoms: fever, otalgia, and irritability. Response to treatment was based on resolving the middle ear effusion. Patients were randomized to one of the study groups. Ten days after initiation of therapy (40 mg/kg/d divided over three doses with a maximum of 1 g/d of cefaclor or amoxicillin) otoscopy, tympanometry, and audiometry were repeated. Treatment was repeated if effusion was present; otherwise, the patient received no further treatment. The children who took another ten-day course of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.