You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 9, September 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Medical News
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Revision Cochlear Prosthesis Surgery: Its Effect on Performance

GORDON B. HUGHES, MD
Cleveland

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(9):918.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

At the annual meeting of the American Neurotology Society in Denver, Susan B. Waltzman, PhD, Noel L. Cohen, MD, and William H. Shapiro, MA, presented a case report of a child who successfully underwent multichannel cochlear implantation after refusing to use a previously implanted single-channel unit. He was deafened at age 51/2 years from meningitis and underwent single-channel implantation (Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing—House) at age 11 years. After two years, he stopped using the device because he felt it did not help him. At age 16 years, he investigated and requested a multichannel device. At the New York University School of Medicine, the single-channel unit was replaced by a multichannel unit (Nucleus).

Postoperative testing revealed improvement in pure-tone average and speech-detection threshold compared with the single-channel unit. Speech-tracking abilities also improved. Because no test performance decreased, the authors suggested that revision cochlear implantation be considered in selected cases. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.