You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 113 No. 6, June 1987 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Medical News
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improvement of Olfaction With a Larynx Bypass Device After Laryngectomy

JOHN E. KVETON, MD
Burlington, Mass

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987;113(6):591.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

David M. Swartz, MD, of Upstate Medical Center, Syracuse, NY, received the Resident Award at the January 1987 Eastern Section Meeting of the Triological Society for his investigation on the improvement of hyposmia following laryngectomy using a larynx bypass device. Odorant detection thresholds with confusion matrix identification tests were administered to laryngectomees and control patients to determine whether the olfactory deficit could be reversed by restoring nasal airflow. The various nasal stimulants administered were divided into those producing trigeminal nerve stimuli and those that primarily stimulate the olfactory epithelium.

Data were collected on nasal airflow characteristics with and without the bypass in both control and laryngectomee groups. Loss of nasal airflow was identified as the major factor in appreciation of the trigeminal irritants. Restoration of nasal airflow rates with the larynx bypass device reversed the hyposmia for trigeminal nerve stimuli. The olfactory epithelium stimulants, though, were not found to be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1987 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.