You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 3, March 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Medical News
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Facial Reanimation With VII-XII Cranial Nerve Anastomosis: Analysis of Functional and Psychologic Results

MYLES L. PENSAK, MD
Cincinnati

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112(3):257.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The VII-XII cranial nerve anastomosis has been selectively employed for the restitution of mimetic function in individuals undergoing facial nerve sacrifice along with the removal of cerebellopontile angle and skull base tumors. Myles L. Pensak, MD, assistant professor, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, reviewed the experience at the Otologic Group, PC, by means of a detailed questionnaire and patient photographs documenting current mimetic status. The results, based on 61 responses, were reported at the meeting. Three variables discussed were reanimation potential, physical disability, and psychosocial disability.

Ninety percent of the patients regained facial movement to some degree. The primary area of initial reanimation was the mouth (58%), followed by the eyes (18%), the nasal region (15%), and, finally, the forehead (9%). Additionally, patients characterized their results as excellent to good, fair, and poor, based on specific criteria such as synkinesis, mass motion, symmetry at rest, hypoglossaloral . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.