You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 112 No. 2, February 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Medical News
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Brain-Stem Auditory-Evoked Responses in High-Risk Infants

KENNETH H. RICHMOND, MD
Philadelphia

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112(2):135.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The effect of high levels of ambient acoustic noise on the results of auditory brain-stem (evoked) response (ABR) screening programs for high-risk infants has never been well documented. Consequently, Kenneth Richmond, MD, Dan Konkle, PhD, and William Potsic, MD, Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Disorders, Children's Hospital, Philadelphia, examined the ABR waveforms obtained at various levels of stimulus intensity and background noise. The subjects were ten adults and ten high-risk infants whose ABRs were judged normal when measured at a 20-dB nHL stimulus in a quiet condition. Ambient noise was measured in the infant care nursery and then accurately reproduced in the sound field of an audiometric booth. Auditory brain-stem (evoked) responses were obtained from each subject for stimulus intensities ranging from 20 to 80 dB nHL in a quiet condition and were repeated at background noise levels of 40, 50, and 60 dBA. These background noise levels corresponded roughly . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.