You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 111 No. 8, August 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Books
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Advances in Audiology

vol 2: Cochlear Implants in Clinical Use, edited by W. D. Keidel and P. Finkenzeller, 176 pp, 79 illus, $84, New York, S Karger AG, 1984.

J. M. NEDZELSKI, MD, FRCS(C), Reviewer
Toronto

Arch Otolaryngol. 1985;111(8):561.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Recent Food and Drug Administration approval for the general use of a single-channel intracochlear implant as a method of treating profound deafness in adults has underscored the need to be informed as to the state of knowledge in this area. This book, consisting of 14 papers given at a symposium on artificial auditory stimulation held at the University of Erlangen, West Germany, in 1982, provides an overview of this topic based on material provided by a literal "who's who" of researchers in this matter.

Some topics include the aims of single vs multichannel cochlear stimulation; the pros and cons of extracochlear vs intracochlear electrode insertion; the rationale for various speech processor strategies.

A major problem in comparing the effectiveness of cochlear prostheses has been the lack of a universally accepted preinsertion and postinsertion test battery. A plea for the use of the minimal-auditory-capabilities—screening battery is made in this regard. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.