You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 8, August 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Routine Panendoscopy—Is It Necessary Every Time?

H. BRYAN NEEL, III, MD, PHD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1984;110(8):531-532.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The report by Atkins and associates1 on the frequency of positive endoscopy results in patients with cancer of the head and neck is timely because it raises the issue of the costbenefit ratio and brings to our attention the problem of multiple squamous cell carcinomas in the upper aerodigestive tract, the lower tracheobronchial tree, the lungs, and the esophagus.

Those of us who treat patients with tumors in these areas are acutely aware of the fact that multiple primary carcinomas occur in the common contiguous pathways of tissue shared by these organs, particularly in those who smoke tobacco or drink alcohol. This observation reflects the process of "field cancerization" in the epithelial tissues.

See also p 533.

Interest in multiple primary malignant neoplasms is long-standing.2 Since 1932, when Warren and Gates3 culled from the literature reports on 1,259 patients with multiple primary malignant neoplasms, thousands of cases . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Rochester, Minn



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.