You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 2, February 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Proper Treatment of Peritonsillar Abscess

An Exercise in Cost Containment

ROBERT W. CANTRELL, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1984;110(2):103.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The proper treatment of peritonsillar abscess remains a controversial area of otolaryngology—head and neck surgery. Accepted treatment today consists of either incision and drainage with or without later tonsil-

See also p 104.

lectomy or immediate tonsillectomy, with appropriate antibiotic therapy administered in all cases. The patient is hospitalized in many cases, particularly the ones who undergo the tonsillectomy. Now, in an accompanying article in this issue, Herzon1 describes five years of experience in treating 41 patients with peritonsillar abscesses with needle aspiration and oral antibiotics. Thirty-nine of these patients were treated as outpatients. Fifty-four patients, suspected of having peritonsillar abscess, were treated initially either in the emergency room or the otolaryngology clinic with a maximum of two needle aspirations, using an 18-gauge spinal needle attached to a 10-mL syringe. The abscesses of 13 patients yielded no pus on needle aspiration. These patients were not considered to have peritonsillar . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Charlottesville, Va



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.