You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 110 No. 1, January 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Books
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Trauma

edited by Michael P. Federle and Michael Brant-Zawadski, 264 pp, with illus, $39.95, Baltimore, Williams & Wilkins Co, 1982.

ARNOLD M. NOYEK, MD, FRCS(C), Reviewer
Toronto

Arch Otolaryngol. 1984;110(1):68.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Trauma is a nicely illustrated hardbound book edited by two experienced radiologists from San Francisco General Hospital. There are seven contributors to this 264-page work (five radiologists, one neurosurgeon, and one otolaryngologist). The book is divided into seven chapters—three of which have direct relevance for the otolaryngologist (ie, maxillofacial injury, laryngeal trauma and, to a lesser degree, head trauma); four other chapters are devoted to the cervical spine, the chest, the abdomen, and the pelvis.

Though the authors imply that the book would appeal to both imagers and clinicians, its main thrust is toward the radiologist. To this reviewer, the book is clearly an educational tool designed to enlighten the work-a-day radiologist in computed tomography (CT) interpretation, based on the authors' experience during the preceeding two years. The purpose is well served. There are good pathophysiologic-imaging correlations but little substance for the clinician . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1984 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.