You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 11 No. 1, January 1930 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

OTOSCLEROSIS IN ITS HISTOGENIC RELATIONS TO OSTEODYSTROPHIA FIBROSA (OSTITIS FIBROSA)

MORITZ WEBER, M.D.

Arch Otolaryngol. 1930;11(1):1-35.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

CONTENTS

Observations in a Case of Osteodystrophia Fibrosa in a Dog

Summary of General Observations Published in a Previous Paper

Details of the Condition in the Organ of Hearing

The Histogenesis of Osteodystrophia Fibrosa in Comparison with That of Otosclerosis

The Question of Dystrophy and Degeneration

The Reaction

Resorption

Appearance of Mesenchymal Tissue

The Reparation

Progressive Phase (Differentiation)

Fibrous marrow

Formation of "nucleus"

Regressive Phase (Disturbances of Differentiation)

Lack of differentiation

Faulty differentiation

Nature of Otosclerosis as Inferred from the Comparison with Osteodystrophia Fibrosa

Hamartoplasia

Osteodystrophia Otosclerotica

The Diagnosis of Otosclerosis in Cases of Generalized Osteodystrophia Fibrosa

Summary

Bibliography

The relations between otosclerosis and ostedystrophia fibrosa have received considerable attention in the literature from both the clinical and anatomic standpoints. However, to my knowledge, no special critical comparison of these two diseases from the standpoint of histogenesis has appeared considering the most recent contributions made to the pathology of isteodystrophia . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SAN FRANCISCO

From the George Williams Hooper Foundation for Medical Research, University of California.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication, Aug. 13, 1929.

This study was aided by grants from the John C. and Edward Coleman Memorial Fund.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1930 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.