This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Paul H. Ward, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108(10):639-643.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A grantsman is usually considered to be a person who successfully writes grant applications. The term carries a connotation that the writer of the grant has some particular ability or inside track on the method needed to apply for and successfully acquire funds to support a project. There is also a negative aura that surrounds the term grantsmanship, which has been built up primarily by those unsuccessful in competing for funds. This negative connotation has been promulgated in the form of myths that are untrue stories without a base of reality. The purpose of this article is to dispel some of these misconceptions and untruths that are counterproductive in the preparation of a quality research grant application. In the preparation of this article, discussions have been held with a number of persons including grant applicants, former study section members, council members, and members of the National Institute of Neurological and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Division of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA School of Medicine.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication June 7, 1982.

Read in part before the First National Conference on Research Goals and Methods in Otolaryngology, Bethesda, Md, April 17, 1982.

Reprint requests to the Division of Head and Neck Surgery, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90024 (Dr Ward).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?