This Article  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

John E. Bordley, MD

Arch Otolaryngol. 1982;108(10):612-615.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In a recent speech, Senator John Glenn stated that, in the past 15 years, the gross investment of the United States in research and development had decreased by, at least, 20% and that there had been a corresponding critical reduction in the production of technically trained people needed to make advances in our knowledge in their fields. This statement is appropriate for this workshop. To begin our deliberations concerning research goals and methods in otolaryngology this morning, it seems only right to review the history of research training in otolaryngology. My charge is to present the story of research training support for our specialty by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS). Since the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness (NINDB) first undertook such support in 1956, it has been, by far, the greatest influence and largest contributor to research training in otolaryngology.

In 1950, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Otolaryngology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore.

Footnotes
Accepted for publication June 7, 1982.

Read in part before the First National Conference on Research Goals and Methods in Otolaryngology, Bethesda, Md, April 15, 1982.

Reprint requests to 550 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205 (Dr Bordley).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?