You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 107 No. 2, February 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Hearing Loss

ed 2, by Joseph Sataloff, Robert Thayer Sataloff, and Lawrence A. Vassallo, 425 pp, with illus, Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Co, 1980.

LAWRENCE W. TRAVIS, MD, Reviewer
New Orleans

Arch Otolaryngol. 1981;107(2):132.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

There are several important changes in this updated version of Joseph Sataloff's 1966 first edition. Two joint authors are now included—Lawrence Vassallo, an audiologist and previous contributor, and Robert Thayer Sataloff, currently a senior resident in otolaryngology at the University of Michigan, and acknowledged by Joseph Sataloff as the primary author of the revision.

The book is directed to primary care physicians and physicians involved in occupational deafness and hearing conservation. It is admitted by the authors to be no textbook of anatomy, pathology, or treatment of ear disease. Some chapters are concerning the diagnostic criteria of hearing losses, which are divided into conductive, sensory, neural, sensorineural, mixed, functional, and central causes. Other chapters emphasize audiometric testing and findings. Although the chapters are somewhat numerous and overlapping, the tables, lists, and audiometric illustrations are thorough. The emphasis on the clssification of sensorineural losses seems unnecessary in view of the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.