This Article  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JOSEPH RANSOHOFF, MD
New York

Arch Otolaryngol. 1980;106(10):655.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—I have read the editorial by Hitselberger and House in the February ARCHIVES (106:69,1980) concerning the use of the sitting position for acoustic tumor surgery. Hitselberger and House mention the problems of the sitting position in terms of air embolism and complications of excessive flexion of the cervical spine in patients with osteoarthritic ridging, producing spinal cord damage.

Having had personal experience during the past 30 years with the use of the sitting position in the treatment of acoustic nerve tumors, an experience that obviously predates the operating microscope and even our current sophistication in the management of air embolism, I respectfully submit that Hitselberger and House have overstated their case.

There is no question that small- or medium-sized acoustic nerve tumors can be removed through various positions. Large acoustic nerve tumors that splay themselves along the brainstem from the point of insertion of the lower . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?