You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 101 No. 6, June 1975 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

High-Intensity Spontaneous Nystagmus Direction Does Indicate Laterality

ALFRED C. COATS, MD
Department of Neurophysiology The Methodist Hospital Houston, Tex

Arch Otolaryngol. 1975;101(6):401.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—In this issue of the ARCHIVES (see page 358), Downie and Simmons state, "We differ from Coats1 in that our data show no tendency to lateralize the side of the caloric weakness at higher velocities of spontaneous nystagmus." The authors appear to have misinterpreted their own data, probably because they divided their patients into nystagmus-intensity subgroups too small to allow valid statistical analysis.

In the Table I have divided their patients into two large nystagmus-intensity subgroups. Combining patients with right- and left-beating spontaneous nystagmus (as I did in the report with which Downie and Simmons disagree) does demonstrate a "tendency to lateralize the side of the caloric weakness at higher velocities of spontaneous nystagmus." The only difference between my results and theirs is that the "tendency to lateralize" is less in their population (57% for low-intensity nystagmus and 69% for high-intensity nystagmus in their study vs . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1975 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.