You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 133 No. 1, January 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cochlear Implantation
 •Hearing Loss/ Deafness
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids in Infants and Children Younger Than 5 Years

Taryn Davids, MD; Karen A. Gordon, PhD; Doug Clutton, MClSc; Blake C. Papsin, MD, MSc

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133(1):51-55.

Objective  While bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs) are currently indicated for rehabilitation in children older than 5 years with bilateral maximal conductive hearing loss, our objective was to capitalize on potentially important stages of auditory and speech-language development by providing BAHAs to children younger than 5 years.

Design  A retrospective review of surgical data of children receiving BAHA implants over a 10-year period.

Setting  The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.

Patients  Twenty children 5 years or younger (mean ± SD age, 3.21 ± 1.65 years) served as the study group, while 20 older children (mean ± SD age, 7.63 ± 1.55 years) served as the comparison group.

Interventions  All patients received BAHA implants. Children with cortical bone thickness less than 2.5 mm underwent a 2-stage procedure; children with cortical bone thickness greater than 4 mm underwent a single-stage procedure.

Main Outcome Measures  Traumatic and skin revision complication rates and implantation interstage intervals were compared between groups.

Results  The mean ± SD interstage interval was 7.72 ± 3.81 months for the younger children, which was significantly longer than for the older children (4.41 ± 2.51 months) (P<.003). Two traumatic fixture losses occurred in the younger children, while 4 occurred in the older children. Skin site revision was required in 3 younger children. All children are currently wearing their BAHAs.

Conclusion  Two-stage BAHA implantation with a prolonged interval between stages yields surgical success in younger children comparable to that routinely observed in older children.


Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology (Drs Davids and Papsin) and Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Gordon and Mr Clutton), The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.