You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 2, February 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endocrine Disease of Head & Neck
 •Surgery
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Thyroid/ Parathyroid Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Arterial and Venous Parathyroid Hormone Levels in Minimally Invasive Surgery

Andrew C. Urquhart, MD; Carmen Wiley, PhD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:137-139.

ABSTRACT

Objective  To establish if venous and arterial parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels are similar during minimal access parathyroid surgery.

Design  Prospective study.

Setting  Marshfield Clinic, a large multispecialty tertiary care referral center in central Wisconsin.

Patients  All patients who underwent minimally invasive parathyroid surgery over a 10-month period.

Results  Fifteen consecutive patients were evaluated. There were 11 women and 4 men, with an average age of 65 years. All patients underwent a preoperative technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scan, with 11 localizing to the site of a probable adenoma. Mean ionized calcium levels were 5.95 mg/dL (1.49 mmol/L) preoperatively and 4.84 mg/dL (1.21 mmol/L) postoperatively. Of 13 patients undergoing both arterial and venous sampling, mean baseline venous PTH level was 221 pg/mL and 37 pg/mL at 10 minutes after excision of suspected adenoma (83% decline). Mean baseline arterial PTH level was 247 pg/mL and 38 pg/mL at 10 minutes after excision (84% decline). Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, there was no significant difference in the arterial vs venous levels at baseline (P = .70) or 10 minutes (P = .48).

Conclusions  Intraoperative PTH levels during minimal access parathyroid surgery are similar for venous and arterial samples. Blood samples for PTH level monitoring can be obtained using a temporary indwelling arterial line.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Recent advances in parathyroid surgery have resulted in a move toward minimal access approaches with removal of the specific abnormal gland, thereby avoiding the need for a full 4-gland exploration. This has resulted in decreased operating time with less morbidity and hospitalization. Further advances have included technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scanning and radio-guided probes for parathyroid localization. Up to 15% of primary hyperparathyroidism may be due to multiglandular disease,1 either parathyroid hyperplasia or, more rarely, double adenomas. Thus, there is a chance of persistent postoperative hypercalcemia requiring further exploration.

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (PTH) determination is a recent advance that can give rapid confirmation of complete resection of a suspected adenoma. It is an excellent predictor of postoperative normocalcemia while the patient is still on the operating table.2-3 Persistently elevated PTH levels imply inadequate removal of parathyroid tissue with the need for further exploration.4-5

The rapid intraoperative intact PTH assay (Immulite turbo intact PTH assay; Diagnostics Products Corporation, Los Angeles, Calif) is approved for venous sampling. This usually requires obtaining at least 2 blood samples during surgery. Access to fresh venous blood during the procedure can be difficult and may require multiple needle sticks, particularly if the PTH does not drop after the initial removal of the suspected adenoma. Venous blood may be drawn from the forearm or dorsum of the foot. Arterial blood can be obtained with insertion of an arterial catheter into the radial artery after induction of anesthesia, offering an easily accessible site, which can be used repeatedly for obtaining multiple blood samples during the procedure. We sought to establish whether routine insertion of an arterial catheter for sampling of intraoperative PTH would be appropriate and specifically if there was any difference in arterial and venous blood levels drawn at the time of surgery.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Approval was obtained from the Marshfield Clinic institutional review board. Patients were evaluated prospectively over a 10-month period between June 2002 and April 2003. All patients underwent an initial preoperative technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scan for localization. A scan was done the morning of surgery, with use of an intraoperative radio-guided probe for parathyroid adenoma localization. A small horizontal incision was made in the lower neck on the side of the localizing technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scan. Prior to removal of the suspected adenoma, arterial and venous PTH levels were obtained. The arterial blood was drawn from an indwelling arterial catheter that had been inserted after induction of anesthesia, usually in the radial artery of the left lower arm. Venous blood was drawn directly from the most accessible area, either the superficial veins of the forearm or dorsal veins of the foot. Analysis was done in the central laboratory using an Immulite turbo intact PTH assay. Ten minutes after removal of the suspected adenoma, blood levels were again measured. With a decline in PTH levels of more than 50%, the wound was closed and procedure completed. If the PTH levels remained elevated, further exploration was done, including exposure of the opposite side, until the abnormal parathyroid tissue was identified and removed. This resulted in multiple PTH level blood sampling until the levels dropped to below 50% of the baseline.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Fifteen consecutive patients were evaluated over a 10-month period. There were 11 women and 4 men, with an average age of 65 years. All patients underwent a preoperative technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scan, with 11 localizing to the site of a probable adenoma. Mean ionized calcium levels were 5.95 mg/dL (1.49 mmol/L) preoperatively and 4.84 mg/dL (1.21 mmol/L) postoperatively. Of 13 patients undergoing both arterial and venous sampling, mean venous PTH levels at baseline and 10 minutes after excision of suspected adenoma were 221 pg/mL and 37 pg/mL respectively (83% decline). Mean arterial PTH levels at baseline and 10 minutes after excision of suspected adenoma were 247 pg/mL and 38 pg/mL, respectively (84% decline). Using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, there was no significant difference in the arterial vs venous levels at baseline (P = .70) or 10 minutes after excision (P = .48) (Figure).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Figure. Intraoperative arterial and venous intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels at baseline and 10 minutes after excision.



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

These results provide evidence that arterial blood samples may be used instead of venous blood samples for the intraoperative determination of PTH levels before and after adenoma excision.

Although hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue can be localized with technetium Tc 99m sestamibi scanning to improve preoperative localization6-7 and the gamma probe can be used as an adjuvant technique that helps with accurate localization at the time of surgery, completeness of excision in the past could only be predicted by decreased calcium levels in the postoperative period. The development of assays to measure the intact PTH molecule during parathyroidectomy was a big advance.8

The concentration of biologically active PTH in the healthy patient is usually low (<50 pg/mL) but can easily be measured with heterogeneous immunoassays. The half-life of biologically active PTH is short (2-5 minutes),2 and the decrease in intraoperative intact PTH is particularly useful in predicting removal of all abnormal parathyroid tissue. A drop in intact PTH levels greater than 50% at 10 minutes after excision of abnormal parathyroid tissue is predictive of postoperative normocalcemia.9 A persistently elevated level of intact PTH at the time of surgery requires further exploration,4 and this was indeed the case in 3 of our patients. Thus, postoperative success can be predicted before surgical closure, potentially avoiding a second procedure in some patients.2-3

Intraoperative PTH levels have been most commonly determined by selective venous sampling.2-5 While venous sampling may be performed readily and conveniently in those critically and chronically ill patients who may already have an indwelling central venous catheter, venipuncture can be problematic for surgical patients who do not. Ability to access peripheral veins is affected by chronic diseases, hydration status, age, and number of previous venipunctures.

Sampling from a peripheral arterial catheter was thought to be a viable alternative. It is almost universally used in the operating room during major surgery and the intensive care environment for continuous hemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling.10-11 It was important, however, to establish whether there was a difference between arterial and venous PTH levels because the biological half-life of intact PTH is only 2 to 5 minutes. Our findings revealed no significant difference, suggesting that blood can easily be drawn from an indwelling arterial site without the need for multiple venous needle sticks caused by difficult access.

Arterial cannulation has proven to be a safe procedure. Trained nonphysician personnel can safely insert arterial catheters following protocol.12 As with central vein catheters, the use of portable ultrasound guidance in insertion of radial artery catheters can increase the rate of success at the first attempt and reduce the number of cannulae used for successful catheter insertion,13 both of which potentially represent cost savings.

Few serious complications are reported for arterial cannulation.11 When sterile barrier precautions are followed during arterial catheter insertion, the incidence of catheter-related infectious complications is comparable with the incidence of central venous catheter-related infections.11, 14 The most common complication in radial artery cannulation is temporary occlusion of the artery, but this generally has no serious sequelae.11 Other rare but serious complications include pseudoaneurysm with an associated increased risk for infection, sepsis and rupture, formation of extracorporeal pseudoaneurysm, hematoma formation, bleeding at the puncture site, abscess, cellulites, paralysis of the median nerve, suppurative thromboarteritis, air embolism, compartment syndrome, and carpal tunnel syndrome. When the radial artery is not accessible, the femoral or axillary artery provides an alternative site for cannulation with comparable levels of safety.11

In conclusion, arterial and venous blood levels are similar for peripheral sampling of PTH during minimal access parathyroid surgery. Using an indwelling arterial catheter facilitates exposure and blood drawing during the procedure and avoids multiple needle sticks and difficult access associated with venous sampling.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Andrew C. Urquhart, MD, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Marshfield Clinic, 1000 N Oak Ave, Marshfield, WI 54449 (urquhart.andrew{at}marshfieldclinic.org).

Submitted for Publication: March 16, 2004; final revision received August 24, 2004; accepted October 21, 2004.

Acknowledgment: We thank Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation for its support through the assistance of Graig Eldred, PhD, Doreen Luepke, and Jennifer Virnoche, MS, in the preparation of the manuscript.

Financial Disclosure: None.

Author Affiliations: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery (Dr Urquhart) and Marshfield Laboratories (Dr Wiley), Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wis.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Thompson NW, Eckhauser FE, Harness JK. The anatomy of primary hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 1982;92:814-821. PUBMED
2. Mandell DL, Genden EM, Mechanick JI, Bergman DA, Diamond EJ, Urken ML. The influence of intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring on the surgical management of hyperparathyroidism. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:821-827. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Sofferman RA, Standage J, Tang ME. Minimal-access parathyroid surgery using intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:1497-1503. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
4. Boggs JE, Irvin GL III, Molinari AS, Deriso GT. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring as an adjunct to parathyroidectomy. Surgery. 1996;120:954-958. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
5. Robertson GS, Iqbal SJ, Bolia A, Bell PR, Veitch PS. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone estimation: a valuable adjunct to parathyroid surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992;74:19-22. ISI | PUBMED
6. Blanco I, Carril JM, Banzo I, et al. Double-phase Tc-99m sestamibi scintigraphy in the preoperative location of lesions causing hyperparathyroidism. Clin Nucl Med. 1998;23:291-297. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
7. Samanta A, Wilson B, Iqbal J, Burden AC, Walls J, Cosgriff P. A clinical audit of thallium-technetium subtraction parathyroid scans. Postgrad Med J. 1990;66:441-445. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Nussbaum SR, Thompson AR, Hutcheson KA, Gaz RD, Wang CA. Intraoperative measurement of parathyroid hormone in the surgical management of hyperparathyroidism. Surgery. 1988;104:1121-1127. ISI | PUBMED
9. Irvin GL III, Sfakianakis G, Yeung L, et al. Ambulatory parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Arch Surg. 1996;131:1074-1078. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Seneff MG. Arterial line placement and care. In: Irwin RS, Cerra FB, Rippe JM, eds. Irwin and Rippe’s Intensive Care Medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1999:40.
11. Scheer B, Perel A, Pfeiffer UJ. Clinical review: complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine. Crit Care. 2002;6:199-204. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
12. Gronbeck C III, Miller EL. Nonphysician placement of arterial catheters: experience with 500 insertions. Chest. 1993;104:1716-1717. FREE FULL TEXT
13. Levin PD, Sheinin O, Gozal Y. Use of ultrasound guidance in the insertion of radial artery catheters. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:481-484. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
14. Rijnders BJ, Van Wijngaerden E, Wilmer A, Peetermans WE. Use of full sterile barrier precautions during insertion of arterial catheters: a randomized trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:743-748. PUBMED


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.