You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 4, April 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Airway Obstruction
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Nonoperative Management of Complete Tracheal Rings

Michael J. Rutter, FRACS; J. Paul Willging, MD; Robin T. Cotton, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:450-452.

ABSTRACT

Background  Children with complete tracheal rings are often challenging to manage. Most children will present early with a severely compromised airway and will require tracheal reconstruction.

Objective  To show that a small number of minimally symptomatic patients with complete tracheal rings experience airway growth over time and do not require tracheoplasty.

Design  A retrospective medical chart review over a 10-year period.

Setting  A tertiary care pediatric hospital.

Patients  Children (N = 10) with a diagnosis of complete tracheal rings, confirmed on bronchoscopy, who were observed for a minimum of 1 year prior to determining the need for tracheoplasty.

Main Outcome Measures  Patient symptoms, bronchoscopic findings, airway size, and the progression of these over time. Other congenital anomalies, the reason for initial diagnosis, and the need for tracheoplasty were documented.

Results  The 10 patients in our series fell into the following 3 categories: 5 patients were minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic, showed bronchoscopic evidence of progressive airway growth, and did not require tracheoplasty; 2 patients had worsening symptoms of exercise intolerance, showed minimal airway growth, and ultimately required tracheoplasty; and 3 patients are still being clinically observed and may eventually require tracheoplasty. Periods of observation have varied from 1 year to over 12 years.

Conclusions  Not all patients with complete tracheal rings require tracheoplasty. Some have satisfactory airway growth and do not require airway reconstruction. A period of observation to monitor airway growth and clinical symptoms is safe and may spare some patients from undergoing unwarranted airway reconstruction.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Congenital tracheal stenosis due to complete tracheal rings usually requires tracheoplasty. Over the past 2 years we have performed 15 such procedures for this condition, with the slide tracheoplasty being our preferred technique.1 Nevertheless, not all pediatric patients with complete tracheal rings require tracheal reconstruction. In some mildly symptomatic patients, a period of observation helps in determining whether a tracheoplasty will ultimately be required. While there are numerous anecdotal reports of patients with congenital tracheal stenosis being managed nonoperatively,2-6 authors have not specifically addressed this approach. Our objective was to illustrate that for a small number of patients with congenital tracheal stenosis, nonoperative management is a viable strategy.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

We conducted a retrospective medical chart review of patients seen from April 1993 to March 2003 with a confirmed diagnosis of complete tracheal rings made on bronchoscopy, and in whom tracheoplasty was either not required or postponed for at least 1 year after initial diagnosis. Approval for this project was granted by Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center Institutional Review Board.

Airway diameter was estimated by the size of the largest endotracheal tube, endoscope, or bronchoscope that could be easily accommodated. If a 2.0-mm (inner diameter) endotracheal tube was used, the outer diameter of the tube (2.9 mm) was the estimate of airway size. The airway was not sized at every bronchoscopy owing to the risk of acute exacerbation of symptoms. Thus, while a bronchoscopic impression of airway growth was documented at 18 months in patient 8, the most recent formal sizing of the airway was documented at 12 months. Intervals between bronchoscopic evaluations varied from 3 months for younger patients to 2 years for older asymptomatic patients. Patients were followed up until they stopped growing.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Ten patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria (Table 1), of whom 7 were male and 3 female. The age at initial diagnosis ranged from 5 to 98 months, with a mode of 14.5 months. Most patients, however, had been symptomatic since birth. One patient (patient 5) has been completely asymptomatic, with the diagnosis being made after difficulty with intubation for an incidental surgical procedure. In 3 patients, complete tracheal rings were not diagnosed on initial bronchoscopy. Additional congenital anomalies were present in 6 patients; these were cardiovascular in 3. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 138 months.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Details of Patients


All patients had tracheal stenosis (Table 2). Two patients (patients 9 and 10) with progressive exertional dyspnea required tracheoplasty. These patients showed little evidence of airway growth over the period of observation. The 3 youngest patients (patients 6-8) are being closely observed, and 2 of these patients currently show evidence of airway growth. The third (patient 6) is likely to require future tracheoplasty. Five patients (patients 1-5) have shown evidence of significant airway growth, and we do not anticipate the need for future tracheoplasty. Four of these patients are asymptomatic, while 1 is only minimally symptomatic. One patient has been discharged from further follow-up with a mild airway stenosis (Figure 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Tracheal Growth With Age




View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Complete tracheal rings (patient 2).



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

The incidence of undiagnosed complete tracheal rings is unknown, and although this diagnosis has been made in adults,7 it is likely that most patients with complete tracheal rings are symptomatic and are diagnosed during infancy. The percentage of patients who will not require intervention or can safely have intervention delayed is also unknown. Since we are a tertiary care center, our referral pattern prevents our being able to accurately estimate this. However, we believe that up to 10% of patients with complete tracheal rings will not require tracheoplasty.

Five patients in our series (patients 1-3, 5, and 7) have shown proven growth of the airway diameter in the region of the complete rings. Four of these patients have become asymptomatic over time, and 1 (patient 5) has never been symptomatic. After a period of observation, 2 patients (patients 9 and 10) required tracheoplasty at ages 4 and 14 years, respectively, owing to worsening symptoms. The 3 remaining patients are young, and we are not yet certain of the final outcome. It does, however, appear likely that 1 patient will require tracheoplasty in the future.

Three patients (patients 4, 7, and 10) required cardiovascular intervention. Patient 4 required an atrioventricular canal repair as an infant, with the diagnosis of complete tracheal rings not being made until 18 months of age. Patient 7 had a right pulmonary agenesis, with the heart lying in the right chest cavity, and the aorta stretched across the distal trachea causing marked tracheal compression, similar to that occasionally seen in postpneumonectomy syndrome. Because the aorta did not permit access for tracheoplasty, a skin expander balloon was placed extrapleurally in the right chest cavity and slowly inflated to move the heart back to the midline and lift the aorta off the trachea. Later tracheoplasty was planned but has not been required because of symptom resolution and continued airway growth. In patient 10, an increasing oxygen requirement disproportionate to the degree of stenosis prompted a Glenn procedure to correct the anomalous superior vena cava. Two years later, increasing shortness of breath on exertion with no further increase in tracheal diameter prompted tracheoplasty. No patients in this series had a pulmonary artery sling. Whether this represents a higher likelihood that patients with the ring/sling complex will require tracheoplasty or is simply a statistical anomaly due to the small number of patients in this series cannot be ascertained.


CONCLUSIONS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Most patients with complete tracheal rings require tracheoplasty. Surgical intervention is indicated if there is respiratory failure or a worsening of respiratory status. The younger the age at initial presentation, the more likely the need for tracheoplasty. However, for patients who present with few symptoms, a period of observation may be appropriate. This study demonstrates that in a proportion of these patients complete tracheal rings can grow, thus allowing nonoperative management. In patients with persistent or worsening symptoms and minimal increase in the tracheal diameter, tracheoplasty is eventually required. This procedure is not without risk, and intervention is better justified in a patient with significant and worsening symptoms. Moreover, tracheoplasty is technically easier to perform in a larger child.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Corresponding author and reprints: Michael J. Rutter, FRACS, Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039 (e-mail: mike.rutter{at}cchmc.org).

Submitted for publication August 12, 2003; accepted September 9, 2003.

This study was presented at a meeting of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology; May 5, 2003; Memphis, Tenn.

Dr Rutter had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

From the Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and the Department of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

1. Rutter M, Cotton R, Azizkhan R, Manning P. Slide tracheoplasty for the management of complete tracheal rings. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38:928-934. PUBMED
2. Minato N, Itoh K, Nagata N, et al. Treatment of congenital tracheal stenosis: retrospective study of 13 cases. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989;90:434-439. PUBMED
3. Hendry GM, Edmunds AT, Marshall TG, Chalmers N. Sling left pulmonary artery with congenital airway stenosis: non-invasive investigation and conservative management? Br J Radiol. 1991;64:629-631. PUBMED
4. Sailer R, Zimmermann T, Bowing B, Scharf J, Zeilinger G, Stehr K. Pulmonary artery sling associated with tracheobronchial malformations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992;118:864-867. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
5. Wong KS, Lan RS, Liu HP, Lin TY. Congenital tracheal stenosis: report of 6 cases. Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1995;18:365-370. PUBMED
6. Horak E, Hammerer I, Schmitzberger R, Gassner I. Pulmonary sling or ring-sling complex? respiratory problems—diagnosis, therapy, prognosis. Klin Padiatr. 1997;209:121-126. PUBMED
7. Nagappan R, Parkin G, Wright CA, et al. Adult long segment tracheal stenosis attributable to complete tracheal rings masquerading as asthma. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:238-240. PUBMED


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Management of congenital tracheal stenosis in infancy.
Anton-Pacheco et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2006;29:991-996.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Coexistence of left pulmonary artery sling and aortopulmonary window complicated with difficult airway--a rare congenital cardiopulmonary defect
Chen et al.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2005;28:900-902.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laryngotracheal Consequences of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
Khariwala et al.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:336-339.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.