You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 129 No. 7, July 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prognostic Factors and Outcome for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Terence P. Farias, MD; Fernando L. Dias, MD; Roberto A. Lima, MD; Jacob Kligerman, MD; Geraldo M. de Sá, MD; Mauro M. Barbosa, MD; Fernando B. Gonçalves, Jr, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:794-799.

ABSTRACT

Background  Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is a distinct form of cancer of the upper respiratory or digestive tract in which the epidemiologic features, origin, histopathologic types, treatment, and prognosis are different from those associated with other malignant neoplasms of this anatomical area. Recent publications have demonstrated the advantage of aggressive multimodality treatment for advanced NPC.

Objectives  To evaluate the results of standardized treatment of NPC during 11 years and to identify pertinent factors for clinical outcome.

Methods  Between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 2000, 173 patients with newly diagnosed NPC were treated at Instituto Nacional de Cancer. Clinical records and radiographic studies of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. Documented data of the initial presenting symptoms, head and neck examination, radiotherapy protocols, chemotherapy regimens, and surgical technique were analyzed. To determine important prognostic factors, we correlated survival rates with age, clinical stage, tumor extent, histopathological type, and therapeutic approach. The major end point used for assessment was relapse-free survival. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank and Cox proportional hazards regression tests.

Results  Most patients (88.5%) had locoregional advanced disease, mostly (53.4%) of the nonkeratinizing subtype. Forty-seven percent of patients had clinical cervical nodal metastases at first consultation. Gross extension of the primary tumor involving the facial bones and skull base was observed in 39.3% and 20.8%, respectively. Just under 75% of patients were treated with radiotherapy (median dose, 6600 cGy), and 25.4% underwent concomitant chemoradiotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) (median dose, 6800 cGy). The 5-year disease-specific survival for the 173 patients was 32.3%. The disease-specific survival for the radiotherapy group was 22.5%, compared with 61.4% for the chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy group (P = .004). Factors associated with adverse outcomes were age older than 40 years at treatment (P = .001), advanced TNM stage (P = .002), skull base invasion (P = .004), and facial bone invasion (P<.001).

Conclusions  Compared with radiotherapy alone, concomitant chemoradiotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy improved the treatment outcome of patients with NPC treated in our institution. Advanced age, local extension, and stage of the disease adversely affected the prognosis in our patients. Compared with reirradiation, salvage brachytherapy and radical neck dissection for local and regional residual or recurrent NPC were associated with increased rates of locoregional control and survival.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

NASOPHARYNGEAL carcinoma (NPC) is prevalent among populations originating from southern China and their descendants who have emigrated to other parts of the world.1

Its epidemiologic features, origin, histopathological types, presentation, treatment, and prognosis differ from those of malignant neoplasms occurring in other sites of the aerodigestive tract.2-6 Unlike most other squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck, local recurrence and distant metastases are responsible for most of the failures after therapeutic attempts.

Contemporary major challenges in the treatment of NPC, particularly in its advanced stages, are how to improve locoregional control and prevent the development of distant metastases.4-7 Recent evidence has demonstrated the advantage of concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy (CCRT) over radiotherapy (RT) alone in the treatment of NPC.7

This study retrospectively evaluated the association of selected prognostic factors with disease-specific survival rates and analyzed the effectiveness of treatment modalities used for the treatment of NPC.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 2000, 173 patients with newly diagnosed NPC were treated at Instituto Nacional de Câncer. All patients had histologically proven NPC. The pretreatment workup included complete physical examination, endoscopic examination of the nasopharynx, hematologic and biochemistry profile, computed tomography of the nasopharynx and neck, and chest x-ray films.

Clinical records and radiographic studies of the patients were retrospectively reviewed. Documented data of the initial presenting symptoms, head and neck examination, RT protocols, chemotherapy (CT) treatment regimens, and surgical techniques and approaches were analyzed.

To determine important prognostic factors, we correlated survival rates with age, clinical stage, tumor extent, histopathological differentiation, and therapeutic approach. The 2 age groups were subjects aged 40 years or younger vs those older than 40. Disease was staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union Internationale Contre le Cancer 1997 TNM classification and stage grouping. The extent of the tumor at presentation was determined by radiological studies and clinical findings, searching for such characteristics as skull base invasion, facial bone invasion, and regional cervical metastases. Pathological differentiation was classified as 1 of 2 World Health Organization types: type I, keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma; or type II, nonkeratinizing carcinoma, including differentiated nonkeratinizing carcinoma and undifferentiated cancer, sometimes called lymphoepithelioma.

From 1989 to 1998, the treatment used was RT with doses ranging from 6250 to 7100 cGy (median, 6600 cGy) to the primary tumor and the neck in 180 to 200 cGy fractions per day 5 days a week. Since 1998, RT has been administered concomitantly with cisplatin, 25 mg/m2 of height, on days 1 through 4, given by infusion on days 1, 4, and 7 of RT, followed by another 3 cycles of adjuvant CT starting at week 11 after the beginning of RT (cisplatin, 20 mg/m2 per day, and 5-fluorouracil, 1 g/m2 per day, on days 1-4 every 28 days). Concurrent RT was administered 5 times a week at 200 cGy per day up to a dose of 7000 cGy. The accumulated dose given to the primary tumor and involved neck lymph nodes ranged between 6600 and 7000 cGy.

The criteria for response, based on clinical, endoscopic, and radiological examination, were as follows: a complete response was defined as complete regression of all evidence of disease; a partial response required a 50% decrease in the summed products of the 2 largest perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions; and stable disease was defined as no significant change in tumor size. The response after RT was assessed 3 months after completion of the treatment. Patients with a complete response to treatment were followed up every 3 months during the first year, every 4 months during the second year, and every 6 months during the next 3 years. After the fifth year of treatment, follow-up clinical examinations were made yearly.

The major end point used for assessment in this analysis was disease-specific survival. The survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method.8 The difference between survival curves was tested using the Mantel-Cox log-rank test. The stepwise inclusion procedure was used to determine statistically significant prognostic factors. The multivariate analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank and Cox proportional hazards regression tests.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

There were 136 male (78.6%) and 37 female (21.4%) patients (median age, 49 years [range, 13-77 years]); most (71.1%) of them were of white race. Eighty-seven (50.3%) of these patients had a history of tobacco consumption, and 77 (44.5%) had a history of alcohol consumption.

Most (88.5%) of these patients had locoregional advanced disease, mostly (53.4%) of the nonkeratinizing carcinoma subtype. Forty-seven percent (82/173) of patients had clinical cervical nodal metastases at first consultation. Gross involvement of facial bones was observed in 68 patients (39.3%) and gross invasion of the skull base in 36 (20.8%). Histologically, 81 (46.8%) patients had type I keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma, and 92 (53.2%), type II nonkeratinizing squamous cell carcinoma. Patients' disease stages are given in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Stages at Presentation


The outcome of patients with NPC in our institution was analyzed at the end of December 2000, after a minimum follow-up of 16 months and a median follow-up of 45 months (RT group median, 21 months; CCRT group median, 19 months).

One hundred twenty-nine patients (74.6%) were treated with RT (median dose, 6600 cGy), and 44 (25.4%) underwent CCRT (cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil; median dose, 6800 cGy). Fifty-seven patients (33.0%) had local residual disease or recurrence of their tumors, and 27 (15.6%) had regional nodal residual disease or recurrence of their metastases. Distant metastases were observed in 34 patients (19.7%), including metastases to the bones in 23 (67.7%), lungs in 7 (20.6%), and brain in 4 (11.8%).

Fifteen (26.3%) of 57 patients with local persistent or recurrent disease underwent salvage reirradiation with doses increased up to 8200 cGy. Complete response was observed in 1 patient (6.7%) and partial response in 2 (13.3%). They remained disease-free or disease-static for a maximum of 21 months after RT, but all died of their tumors before 24 months.

Ten (17.5%) of 57 patients with local persistent or recurrent disease underwent salvage brachytherapy using intracavitary intubation with doses increased up to 10 250 cGy. Two patients (20.0%) had complete response and 2 other patients (20.0%) had partial response of their tumors. Both patients who had complete response after salvage brachytherapy are alive with no evidence of local disease after 28 and 43 months. One patient who had partial response is alive with persistent but static local disease after 17 months.

One (1.8%) of 57 patients with persistent disease underwent salvage surgery (medial maxillectomy and palate split) for a stage IIa NPC. This patient is alive and free of disease after 17 months.

Ten (37.0%) of 27 patients with regional cervical residual or recurrent disease underwent salvage radical neck dissection. All but 2 patients (80.0%) remained free of disease for a maximum of 63 months after surgery.

Complications of the treatment used and the presence of comorbidities also played a role in the outcome of our patients. Most patients (78.2%) experienced slight trismus after the completion of RT treatment, which did not interfere with their daily life, but 3 patients with severe trismus could not open their mouth more than 1 finger's breadth, significantly interfering with oral intake. Other minor complications such as choanal stenosis (24.0% of patients) and saddle nose (17.8% of patients) were observed. Sphenoid osteoradionecrosis developed in 2 patients, and maxillary osteoradionecrosis was observed in 3 other patients who underwent salvage reirradiation. Massive nasal bleeding occurring late (3 months) after RT occurred in 1 patient. Rupture of the carotid artery in 1 patient with locoregional progression of the disease after CCRT and salvage radical neck dissection also occurred, leading to his death.

Among the cohort of 173, 15 patients (8.7%) died of causes other than the NPC or its treatment during the period. Four patients died of pneumonia, 3 of malnutrition, 3 of cerebrovascular infarction, 2 of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, 1 of myocardial infarction, 1 of pulmonary infarction, and 1 of sputum impaction.

The 5-year disease-specific survival rate for the 173 patients was 32.3%, and the 5-year disease-specific survival rates for the groups of patients according to their stages were 100% for stage I, 85.7% for stage IIa, 54.5% for stage IIb, 30.4% for stage III, 25.0% for stage IVa, and 25.0% for stage IVb. The prognostic association of stage with the outcome of patients in our study was statistically significant (P = .002, Wilcoxon test; P = .001, Cox test) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Analysis of Prognostic Factors


To assess the prognostic association of each therapeutic modality (RT vs CCRT) with outcome, we compared the groups according to their 5-year disease-specific survival rates. The difference was statistically significant (RT group, 22.5%; CCRT group, 61.4%; P = .004). A comparison between the therapeutic groups is shown in Figure 1.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Comparison of 5-year disease-specific survival between the therapeutic groups.


A comparison between the 2 therapeutic groups in each stage of the disease was also performed. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy improved the 5-year disease-specific survival of patients in all stages except those with IIa and IVa, who underwent RT as the only modality of treatment. Nevertheless, the 5-year disease-free survival improvement achieved in the CCRT group compared with the RT group was statistically significant only among patients with stage III disease (P = .05). A comparison of 5-year disease-specific survival according to the disease stage is given in Table 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Comparison of 5-Year Disease-Specific Survival According to Disease Stage


Among the other factors of possible prognostic association analyzed in our study, age older than 40 years, invasion of the skull base, and invasion of facial bones adversely affected the disease-specific survival rates of patients (P = .001, P = .004, and P<.001, respectively). The only factor in our study that did not correlate with prognosis was the histopathological type of NPC (P = .10). An analysis of prognostic factors is given in Table 2.


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma usually runs asymptomatically for long periods, precluding early diagnosis. In most cases, the diagnosis is made based on locoregional advanced disease symptoms, such as cranial nerve involvement or cervical nodal metastases.9-10 Most (88.5%) of our patients were classified as having stages III and IV of the disease at first consultation, with cervical nodal metastases as the most common (47.4%) clinical presentation.

Nasopharyngeal carcinomas are sensitive to RT and CT.11-12 The RT and CT sensitivity of these tumors and the difficulties and complexity of current surgical approaches have led to the conservative management of NPC, with surgical therapy left for salvage of residual or recurrent locoregional disease.

Although NPC is a radiosensitive tumor, long-term survival for patients with advanced disease remains poor.4, 13-14 According to recent studies,15-16 with RT alone, the 5-year survival rate for stage IV disease ranges between 28% and 35%.

Marcial et al16 reported a 96% complete response of T1 tumors treated with RT, 88% for T2, 81% for T3, and 74% for T4 tumors. Nevertheless, the 5-year survival rate of all these patients was 40%.

Qin et al17 reviewed the survival of 1379 patients with NPC, most with stage III and IV disease, treated with RT alone and found 5-, 10-, and 20-year survival rates of 46%, 29%, and 17%, respectively. Failure is usually caused by locoregional disease (40%-80% of patients) and distant recurrence (15%-50% of patients).

The overall worldwide 5-year survival rate ranged from 32% to 62% among series involving more than 9500 patients with all stages of NPC.14, 17-24 Our 32.3% 5-year disease-specific survival rate is in line with these results.

The usual dose of RT is 6500 to 7500 cGy in 180 to 200 cGy fractions per day 5 days a week. The dose of irradiation is crucial for achieving locoregional control and improving survival.23 Accelerated hyperfractionated RT may also improve local control rates in patients with advanced NPC. Wang25 reported improvement in local control of patients with NPC with N2 and N3 disease with accelerated hyperfractionated RT, compared with patients treated with conventional RT.

Most (74.6%) of our patients were treated with conventional RT (median dose, 6600 cGy). Radiotherapy was an effective therapeutic strategy only for early-stage NPC. The high rate (76.7% of patients) of residual or recurrent disease in the RT group (except among patients with stage I and IIa disease) indicated that our RT protocol, 6600 cGy in conventional fractionation, was not sufficient to adequately control NPC, particularly in its advanced stages.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is also a chemosensitive tumor.26 Although randomized clinical trials using induction CT have not shown any survival benefit compared with RT alone,27-29 some patients with stage IVc disease treated with CT alone achieved complete response of their tumors.26 In addition, the combination of CT and RT is an attractive therapeutic option because of a possible synergy between them, particularly when cisplatin-based regimens are used.23

The Intergroup Study of North America demonstrated the advantage of CCRT over RT alone.7 Early studies of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group20, 30-31 presented the results of treating 124 patients who had locally advanced, inoperable, or unresectable stage III and IV tumors (including 27 patients with NPC) with concomitant single-agent cisplatin and RT, demonstrating a complete response rate of 89% and an overall survival of 55% for patients with NPC. Hong et al32 reported a 70% 5-year overall survival and an 81% distant metastases-free rate for stage IV NPC treated with induction CT followed by RT.

Huncharek and Kupelnick33 published a meta-analysis evaluating the effect of integrating CT with external beam RT in locoregional advanced NPC. They identified 6 randomized controlled trials enrolling more than 1500 patients that compared standard radical external beam RT (control arm) with RT plus CT delivered adjuvantly, neoadjuvantly, or concurrently with radiotherapy. The outcomes of interest were disease-free or progression-free survival and overall survival. They observed that the addition of CT to RT increased disease-free or progression-free survival by 37% at 2 years, 40% at 3 years, and 34% at 4 years after treatment.33

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant CT has been used since 1998 in our department, which is why only 25.4% of our cohort of patients underwent this type of treatment. Most patients (95.5%) had advanced-stage NPC (stages III and IV). The addition of CT to standard radical RT in our group of patients increased the 5-year disease-specific survival by 22.5% to 61.4% (P = .004), which is similar to several results reported in the literature.11, 20, 30-31

When we compared the outcome of patients for each stage, CCRT was associated with better outcomes compared with RT not only for advanced NPC stages (III and IVb) but also for patients staged IIb, although the difference was statistically significant only among patients with stage III (Table 3). Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for NPC seems to be promising for early stages of NPC too. Because of the small number of patients in the CCRT group, particularly those in early stages of NPC, our single-institution experience deserves further investigation in larger prospective trials.

The nasopharynx is an anatomical site particularly amenable to reirradiation. The feasibility of reirradiation at this site is especially important because the tumors arising in the nasopharynx are generally nonresectable. The management of locally persistent and recurrent NPC is limited by the RT dose that can be safely given by reirradiation using external RT. The use of brachytherapy32, 34-35 and surgery36-37 has generally resulted in better outcomes compared with external reirradiation.21, 38 Using brachytherapy, therefore, a high RT dose can be delivered to the mucosa of the nasopharynx and to tumors lying immediately beneath the mucosa.23 In our study, 15 patients with local persistent tumors received reirradiation with conventional RT with doses increased up to 8200 cGy, and 10 patients with local residual tumors underwent salvage brachytherapy with doses increased up to 10 250 cGy. Patients who underwent salvage brachytherapy had a 20.0% rate of complete response compared with 6.7% among those who received conventional RT. In addition, only the patients salvaged by brachytherapy remained alive and free of disease 24 months after reirradiation. Although patients in our series had a better salvage rate with brachytherapy, compared with external reirradiation, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .06), probably because of the small number of patients. One patient with local residual disease amenable to a limited resection is alive and well 17 months after salvage surgery.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma has a tendency to metastasize. Ahmad and Stefani39 in an autopsy study of 256 men with NPC found that up to 38% of patients had distant metastases. According to the literature, the frequency of metastases is 4.4% to 7% at diagnosis39-40 and 20% to 27% after RT.40 Distant metastases were diagnosed in 19.7% of our patients, mostly (67.7%) to the bones. Regional metastases were present at first consultation in 47.4% of patients. Among the 10 patients (3.7%) who had recurrence in the neck, 80.0% were successfully salvaged by radical neck dissection, remaining free of disease for a maximum of 63 months.

The statistically significant prognostic factors with a negative effect on survival in this series were age older than 40 years, gross invasion of facial bones and skull base, and advanced stage at treatment. Hong and coworkers32 did not find a prognostic correlation with the American Joint Committee on Cancer and Union Internationale Contre le Cancer TNM staging system. Lin et al22 found that local extension of NPC to the nasal mucosa was an independent prognostic factor in predicting the outcome of treatment. Sham et al10 found that the extension of NPC to the paranasopharyngeal space was an important adverse prognostic factor in local control and survival.


CONCLUSIONS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Prognostic factors associated with an adverse effect on locoregional control of disease and on disease-specific survival included advanced stage, invasion of surrounding bony structures, and age older than 40 years.

Salvage brachytherapy and radical neck dissection for local and regional residual or recurrent NPC were associated with increased rates of locoregional control and survival compared with reirradiation.

In our group of patients, CCRT improved locoregional control of NPC compared with RT alone. These results are in line with recent reports in the literature supporting aggressive multimodality therapy for advanced stages of NPC.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Corresponding author and reprints: Fernando L. Dias, MD, Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital do Câncer I, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Av Alexandre Ferreira, 190 Lagoa, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22470-220 Brazil (e-mail: fdias{at}inca.gov.br).

Accepted for publication February 28, 2003.

This study was presented at the annual meeting of the American Head and Neck Society, Boca Raton, Fla, May 11, 2002.

From the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital do Câncer I, Instituto Nacional de Cancer, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

1. Parkin DM, ed, Whelan SL, ed, Ferlay J, ed, Raymond L, ed, Young J, ed. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Vol VII. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 1997.
2. Hoppe RI, Williams J, Warnke R, Goffinet DR, Bagshaw MA. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx—the significance of histology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1978;4:199-205. ISI | PUBMED
3. Shanmugaratuum K, Sobin L. Histology typing of upper respiratory tract tumors. In: International Histologic Typing of Tumors. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1978:32-33.
4. Geara FB, Sanguineti G, Tucker FL, et al. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of distant metastasis and survival. Radiother Oncol. 1997;43:53-61. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
5. Fandi A, Altun M, Azli N, Armand JP, Cvitkovic E. Nasopharyngeal cancer: epidemiology, staging, and treatment. Semin Oncol. 1994;21:382-397. ISI | PUBMED
6. Sanguineti G, Geara FB, Garden AS, et al. Carcinoma of the nasopharynx treated by radiotherapy alone: determinants of local and regional control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:985-996. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
7. al-Sarraf M, LeBlanc M, Giri PG, et al. Chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal cancer: phase III randomized Intergroup study 0099. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16:1310-1317. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Kaplan E, Meier P. Non-parametric estimation for incomplete observation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1958;53:457-481. FULL TEXT | ISI
9. Sham JST, Cheung YK, Choy D, Chan FL, Leong L. Computed tomography evaluation of neck node metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26:787-792. ISI | PUBMED
10. Sham JST, Choy D, Wei WI. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: orderly neck node spread. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1990;19:929-933. ISI | PUBMED
11. al-Sarraf M, McLaughlin P. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: choice of treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:761-763. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
12. Schantz SP, Harrison LB, Forastiere AA. Tumor of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, oral cavity and oropharynx. In: De Vita V, ed. Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:741-801.
13. Teo P, Yu P, Lee WY, et al. Significant prognosticators after primary radiotherapy in 903 nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma evaluated by computer tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;36:291-304. ISI | PUBMED
14. Lee AW, Poon YF, Foo W, et al. Retrospective analysis of 5037 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976-1985: overall survival and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:261-270. ISI | PUBMED
15. Heng DM, Wee J, Fong KW, et al. Prognostic factors in 677 patients in Singapore with nondisseminated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86:1912-1920. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
16. Marcial VA, Hanley JA, Chang C, Davis LW, Moscol JA. Split-course radiation therapy of carcinoma of the nasopharynx: results of a national collaborative clinical trial of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980;6:409-414. ISI | PUBMED
17. Qin DX, Hu YH, Yan JH, et al. Analysis of 1379 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by radiation. Cancer. 1988;61:1117-1124. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
18. Shu-Chen H. Nasopharyngeal cancer: a review of 1605 patients treated radically with cobalt 60. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980;6:401-407. ISI | PUBMED
19. Hsu MM, Huang SC, Lynn TC, Hsieh T, Tu SM. The survival of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinomas. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1982;90(pt 1):289-295. ISI | PUBMED
20. al-Sarraf M, Pajak TF, Cooper JS, Mohiuddin M, Herskovic A, Ager PJ. Chemo-radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 1990;8:1342-1351. ABSTRACT
21. Lee AWM, Law SCK, Foo W, et al. Retrospective analysis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976-1985: survival after local recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26:773-782. ISI | PUBMED
22. Lin ZX, Li DR, Chen ZJ, et al. What is the significance of nasal involvement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:907-914. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
23. Ali H, al-Sarraf M. Nasopharyngeal cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1999;13:837-848. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
24. Wang DC, Cai WM, Hu YH, Gu XZ. Long-term survival of 1035 cases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 1988;61:2338-2341. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
25. Wang CC. Accelerated hyperfractionation radiation therapy for carcinoma of the nasopharynx. Cancer. 1989;63:2461-2467. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
26. Fandi A, Bachouchi M, Azli N, et al. Long-term disease-free survivors in metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:1324-1330. FREE FULL TEXT
27. Chan AT, Teo PM, Leung TW, et al. A prospective randomized study of chemotherapy adjunctive to definitive radiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;33:569-577. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
28. Rossi A, Molinari R, Boracchi P, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy with vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin after radiotherapy in local-regional nasopharyngeal cancer: results of a 4-year multicenter randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:1401-1410. FREE FULL TEXT
29. Ma J, Mai HQ, Hong MH, et al. Results of a prospective randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radiotherapy with radiotherapy alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:1350-1357. FREE FULL TEXT
30. al-Sarraf M, Zundmanis M, Marcial VA, et al. Concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: RTOG study [abstract]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1986;5:142.
31. al-Sarraf M, Pajak TF, Marcial VA, et al, for the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy with cisplatin in inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: an RTOG study. Cancer. 1987;59:259-265. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
32. Hong RL, Ting LL, Ko JY, et al. Induction chemotherapy with mitomycin, epirubicin, cisplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin followed by radiotherapy in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:4305-4313. FREE FULL TEXT
33. Huncharek M, Kupelnick B. Combined chemoradiation versus radiation therapy alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: results of a meta-analysis of 1,528 patients from six randomized trials. Am J Clin Oncol. 2002;25:219-223. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
34. Choy D, Sham JST, Wei WI, Ho CM, Wu PM. Transpalatal insertion of radioactive gold grain for the treatment of persistent and recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;25:505-512. ISI | PUBMED
35. Sham JST, Wei WI, Choy D, Ho CM, Tai PT, Choi PH. Treatment of persistent and recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma by brachytherapy. Br J Radiol. 1989;62:355-361. FREE FULL TEXT
36. Wei WI, Ho CM, Yuen PW, Fung CF, Sham JS, Lam KH. Maxillary swing approach for resection of tumors in and around the nasopharynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995;121:638-642. FREE FULL TEXT
37. Morton RP, Liavaag PG, McLean M, Freeman JL. Transcervico-mandibulo-palatal approach for surgical salvage of recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer. Head Neck. 1996;18:352-358. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
38. Lee AWM, Foo W, Law SCK, et al. Reirradiation for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: factors affecting the therapeutic ratio and ways for improvement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;38:43-52. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
39. Ahmad A, Stefani S. Distant metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a study of 256 male patients. J Surg Oncol. 1986;33:194-197. ISI | PUBMED
40. Teo PM, Kwan WH, Lee WY, Leung SF, Johnson PJ. Prognosticators determining survival subsequent to distant metastasis from nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 1996;77:2423-2431. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET in Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Yen et al.
JNM 2005;46:770-774.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.