You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 128 No. 10, October 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nasopharyngectomy After Failure of 2 Courses of Radiation Therapy

Hani Z. Ibrahim, MD; Melinda S. Moir, MD; Willard W. Fee, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;128:1196-1197.

ABSTRACT

Background  Recurrence of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after initial therapy has been reported to range between 18% and 54%. As an alternative to surgical salvage, patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma are offered a second course of radiation therapy. If this second course fails, patients may be candidates for surgical resection.

Objective  To identify the effectiveness and morbidity of surgical resection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients who have received 2 cycles of external beam radiation.

Design and Setting  Retrospective survey of 6 patients in a university-based practice who underwent resection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after 2 courses of radiation therapy.

Patients  Our study group comprised 4 women and 2 men aged between 35 and 67 years. All patients underwent 2 courses of radiation with a mean total dose of 11 500 rad (115 Gy) (range, 9500-13 200 rad [95-132 Gy]) delivered to the nasopharynx prior to resection. The mean duration between the second course of radiation and resection is 21 months (range, 8-52 months). The mean follow-up period is 7.2 years (range, 4.2-11.5 years).

Intervention  Nasopharyngectomy after failure of 2 courses of radiation therapy.

Main Outcome Measures  Postoperative clinical outcome and morbidity.

Results  Five years after resection, 1 patient died of disease. The remaining 5 patients (83%) are alive with no evidence of disease. Osteomyelitis is the most common complication, affecting 5 patients. Three of the 5 patients with osteomyelitis required operative debridement of the nasopharynx and split-thickness skin grafting. Other complications include oronasal fistula (2 patients), chronic otitis media (2 patients), and nasopharyngeal stenosis (1 patient).

Conclusion  Although poor wound healing is evident, the overall 5-year survival of 83% is encouraging.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

THE LOCAL control rate of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with external beam radiation (EBRT) has ranged between 18% and 54%.1-4 Preliminary optimistic results have been reported with the use of stereotactic radiosurgery or intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with and without chemotherapy.5 Pending extended follow-up, the effectiveness of multimodality therapy in controlling local disease is yet to be defined.

Even more trying is locally recurrent or persistent local disease in patients who have received 2 courses of EBRT. Hwang et al6 found that 38 (51%) of their 74 patients retreated with EBRT had persistent disease after the second course. The surgical excision of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in reirradiated patients is rarely attempted; hence, the role of surgery in this population remains poorly defined.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

In a retrospective review of salvage nasopharyngectomy performed at Stanford University Medical Center, we report the outcome in 6 of 44 patients who underwent resection of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after receiving 2 courses of EBRT. The remaining 38 patients underwent surgical resection after a single course of EBRT had failed, and results were reported in previous reviews.7-8 This group of 6 patients is composed of 4 women and 2 men aged between 35 and 67 years. All patients underwent 2 courses of EBRT with a mean total dose of 11 500 rad (115 Gy) (range, 9500-13 200 rad [95-132 Gy]) delivered to the nasopharynx. In addition, 2 patients received intracavitary seeds. The mean duration between the second course of radiation therapy and surgical resection is 21 months (range, 8-52 months). The goal of surgical treatment in all 6 patients was curative resection.

Patient selection was based on the extent of local disease. Resection was offered to surgical candidates who showed no evidence of new onset cranial nerve involvement or intracranial extension. Given the difficulty of distinguishing bony involvement from osteoradionecrosis after high-dose EBRT, bony erosion seen on imaging was not a contraindication to the procedure.

The surgical technique is based on the work of Wilson9 with the modifications outlined by Fee et al7 in 1988. All patients underwent a transpalatal approach as well as transcervical approach (for carotid artery isolation). This was supplemented with a transantral approach in 1 patient and facial degloving in another. The clivus (and first vertebral body) was drilled with a large cutting burr, and a wide sphenoidotomy was created. The defect was covered using a split-thickness skin graft. All patients received perioperative antibiotics as long as the nasal packing remained in place.


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

All patients tolerated the surgical resection without immediate complications and had a mean hospital stay of 5 days (range, 1-11 days). Patient 2 was kept intubated overnight. Patient 1 had temporary dysphagia that resolved prior to discharge. Three patients tolerated an oral diet at the time of discharge, and 2 patients were discharged on nasogastric tube feeds (which were discontinued during follow-up outpatient visit). No diet information is available for patient 4.

The most common complication is osteomyelitis of the clival bone, which was seen in 5 patients. Poor skin graft adherence was seen in all 5 patients. All patients were treated with oral antibiotics (culture directed, if possible), and 3 required home intravenous antibiotics. Three patients underwent operative debridement and replacement of split-thickness skin graft with excellent results.

Other complications included oronasal fistula, which developed in 2 patients and required surgical closure in 1. Patient 3 developed a nasopharyngeal stenosis that was released during debridement of the nasopharynx. Two patients developed chronic otitis media.

The mean follow-up period is 7.2 years (range, 4.2-11.5 years). Five years after resection, patient 4 died of disease. The remaining 5 patients (83%) are alive with no evidence of disease.


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

After 2 courses of EBRT, little is left in the way of curative treatment of persistent or recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Given that few such patients undergo surgical resection, the role of nasopharyngectomy in this group remains poorly defined. In a 1997 retrospective analysis, Hsu et al4 included 7 of their patients who underwent nasopharyngectomy after 2 or more courses of radiation therapy. Their patients received a mean of 12 800 rad (128 Gy) of EBRT preoperatively and had a mean follow-up of 19 months after nasopharyngectomy. Only 1 patient was alive without evidence of disease, 1 was alive with local disease, 1 died from distant metastasis, 3 died from local disease, and 1 died from another cause (cerebrovascular accident). Osteomyelitis was seen in only 1 of the 7 patients, 1 patient had cranial nerve X and XII palsy, and another had an oronasal fistula.

The morbidity of nasopharyngectomy in twice-irradiated patients is dominated by poor wound healing. None of our patients had a cerebrospinal fluid leak, meningitis, or perioperative death. Osteomyelitis was seen in most (83%) of our patients secondary to poor bone coverage using the split-thickness skin graft. There is a need for more durable reconstructive techniques. Although free-flap reconstruction would provide healthy tissue for bone coverage, anchoring the flap in this location poses a challenge. Oronasal fistula was seen in 2 patients (33%). In comparison, Fee et al8 reported a series of 15 patients who underwent nasopharyngectomy after only 1 course of radiation therapy. The complications reported include 2 patients (13%) with permanent cranial nerve paralysis, 2 (13%) with osteomyelitis requiring intravenous antibiotics, 2 (13%) with aspiration pneumonia, 2 (13%) requiring prolonged nasogastric tube feedings, and 1 (7%) with intraoperative thyroid storm. Although both series included very small numbers of patients, a comparison suggests that twice-irradiated patients are at a higher risk of poor wound healing.

As for outcome, the high rate of patients (83%) alive without disease suggests the potential effectiveness of the procedure in twice-irradiated patients. A larger prospective series can best assess the role of surgery in this group.


CONCLUSIONS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Given the small number of patients studied in our series, we hesitate to make definitive conclusions on the effectiveness of nasopharyngectomy in twice-irradiated patients. However, the results of this review suggest that in appropriately selected patients, the second course of radiation therapy does not contraindicate surgical resection, and, in fact, the long-term outcome can be excellent. In our patient population, it increased the morbidity of the procedure. Poor wound healing should be anticipated, and great emphasis should be placed on the reconstruction of the surgical bed, including the use of a forearm free flap.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication April 8, 2002.

The study was presented at the Fifth International Conference on Head and Neck Cancer, San Francisco, Calif, July 30, 2001.

Corresponding author and reprints: Hani Z. Ibrahim, MD, 30 N Michigan Ave, Suite 1107, Chicago, IL 60602 (e-mail: ibrahimhani{at}hotmail.com).

From the Department of Otolaryngology & Bronchoesophagology, Rush-Presbyterian-Saint Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill (Dr Ibrahim); and the Division of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, Calif (Drs Moir and Fee).


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Conclusions
 •Author information
 •References

1. Sham JT, Choy D. Prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review of 759 patients. Br J Radiol. 1990;63:51-58. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Lee AW, Law SC, Foo W, et al. Retrospective analysis of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated during 1976-1985: survival after local recurrence. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;26:773-782. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
3. Yamashita S, Konda M, Hashinoto S. Squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx: an analysis of failure patterns after radiation therapy. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985;24:315-320. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
4. Hsu MM, Ko JY, Sheen TS, et al. Salvage surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:305-309. FREE FULL TEXT
5. Tate DJ, Adler JR Jr, Chang SD, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgical boost following radiotherapy in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma: impact on local control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:915-921. FULL TEXT | WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
6. Hwang JM, Fu KK, Phillips TL. Results and prognostic factors in the retreatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:1109-1111.
7. Fee WE, Gilmer PA, Goffinet DR. Surgical management of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiation failure at the primary site. Laryngoscope. 1988;98:1220-1226. WEB OF SCIENCE | PUBMED
8. Fee WE, Roberson JB Jr, Goffinet DR. Long-term survival after surgical resection for recurrent nasopharyngeal cancer after radiotherapy failure. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;117:1233-1236. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Wilson CP. Observations on the surgery of the nasopharynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1957;66:5-40. PUBMED


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.