 |
 |

Intraoperative Fabrication of Palatal Prosthesis for Maxillary Resection
Gady Har-El, MD;
Mahesh Bhaya, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:834-836.
ABSTRACT
 |  |
Background Immediate placement of a palatal prosthesis has become the standard
of care after maxillectomy or palatectomy, except when free-flap reconstruction
is used. Palatal prostheses are usually fabricated preoperatively. Infrequently,
the surgeon may face a situation where upper jaw resection has been performed
and a prefabricated prosthesis is not available.
Objective To describe a method of rapid intraoperative fabrication of a palatal
prosthesis, which allows immediate oral intake and excellent speech.
Procedure Two sheets of thermoplastic dressing (Aquaplast; WFR/Aquaplast Corporation,
Wyckoff, NJ) were immersed in hot water. As they became soft and pliable,
they were applied to the remaining hard palate and alveolar ridge. As the
material cooled, it hardened, with its shape conforming to the remaining hard
palate, alveolar ridge, and teeth. The rigid stent was then removed, trimmed,
and fashioned to cover the palatal and maxillary defect. The stent was then
wired to the remaining alveolar ridge and to the ipsilateral zygomatic buttress
or lateral orbital rim. Removal of the stent was easily accomplished in an
office setting.
Patients Twelve patients required partial upper jaw resection without available
prefabricated prostheses. Of these, 3 patients underwent emergency surgery
for mucormycosis and 2 for bleeding malignant tumors; 3 underwent bone resection
more extensive than that anticipated preoperatively; and 4 did not have prefabricated
prostheses for other reasons.
Results The thermoplastic prosthesis achieved its goals in all 12 patients.
Eleven patients achieved oral food intake within 24 hours. One patient remained
in a coma after extensive maxillary, orbital, and skull base resection for
mucormycosis. The prosthesis was removed after 4 to 12 weeks and replaced
with a permanent implant in 11 of the 12 patients.
Conclusions This simple, quick, and inexpensive intraoperative fabrication of palatal
prosthesis requires no special expertise and equipment. It allows immediate
oral intake and excellent speech.
INTRODUCTION
SURGICAL DEFECTS of the palate can adversely affect a patient's functional
and psychological well-being. The goals of palatal reconstruction are to restore
speech, maintain alimentation, provide lip and cheek support, and reestablish
midface projection. Reconstruction options range from dental prosthesis to
nonvascularized grafts, locoregional flaps, and free tissue transfer.1 When free flaps are not used, immediate placement
of a palatal prosthesis is the standard of care after maxillectomy or palatectomy.
Palatal prostheses are routinely fabricated before surgery by the prosthodontist,
requiring time and planning.
Occasionally, a prefabricated prosthesis is unavailable to the surgeon.
Intraoperative fabrication of a temporary palatal prosthesis would thus be
an alternative. The material used to fabricate a temporary prosthesis should
be easily moldable and placed, cause minimal or no reaction, and be relatively
inexpensive.2
Thermoplastic dressing (Aquaplast; WFR/Aquaplast Corporation, Wyckoff,
NJ) satisfies most criteria of such a stent material. It is easily moldable,
can be reheated and reshaped multiple times, has an unlimited shelf life,
and can be easily disinfected. It has been used extensively for splinting
of the nose after rhinoplasty or closed reduction of nasal fractures. More
recently, it has been used as a tie-down dressing for full-thickness skin
grafts in the nasal and auricular regions. It has also been used for bone
graft contouring for mandibular defects,3 and
it makes a good stent after palatal flaps.4-5
This article describes a method for rapid intraoperative fabrication
of a temporary prosthesis for palatal defects with the use of thermoplastic
material.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two sheets of the perforated 0.16-cm-thick thermoplastic dressing material
were immersed in hot water. We used 2 sheets to increase the strength and
firmness of the stent and to prevent leakage through the perforations, thus
providing an effective seal between the oral and nasal cavities. As they became
soft and pliable, the sheets were applied to the remaining hard palate and
alveolar ridge. As the material cooled, it hardened with its shape conforming
to the remaining hard palate, alveolar ridge, and teeth. The rigid stent was
then removed, trimmed, and fashioned to cover the palatal and maxillary defect.
The stent was then wired to the remaining alveolar ridge and to the ipsilateral
zygomatic buttress or lateral orbital rim. The wires were tied within the
maxillectomy cavity to prevent irritation and discomfort to the lips, buccal
mucosa, or tongue caused by the wire ties. Alternative methods of fixation,
such as a screw drilled directly into the alveolar ridge or hard palate, may
also be used. If packing was used, it was removed gradually through the nose.
Postoperative cavity care, hygiene, and inspection were accomplished transnasally
and/or transorally around the stent.
The stent was left in place for 4 to 12 weeks. Removal of the stent
was easily accomplished in an office setting. The wire loops on the oral side
of the stent were cut first, the stent was removed, and the wires were then
removed. Impression for an interim and a future permanent acrylic prostheses
was then obtained.
RESULTS
Our series of patients included 3 with mucormycosis and 2 with bleeding
malignant tumors who underwent emergent surgery. In another 3 patients, the
bone defect was different from that anticipated preoperatively. The remaining
4 patients did not have preoperative stents available due to logistic problems.
The following 2 case histories illustrate the effective use of an intraoperatively
fabricated palatal prosthesis after palate resection.
PATIENT 1
Patient 1 had extensive mucormycosis and underwent emergent maxillary,
orbital, and skull base resection (Figure
1A). The thermoplastic prosthesis was fabricated intraoperatively
and secured to the remaining alveolar ridge and the ipsilateral zygomatic
buttress (Figure 1B).
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. A, Maxillary, orbital, and skull
base resection for a patient with mucormycosis. B, Prosthesis fabricated intraoperatively
from thermoplastic dressing (Aquaplast; WFR/Aquaplast Corporation, Wyckoff,
NJ) is secured to the ipsilateral zygomatic buttress.
|
|
|
PATIENT 2
Patient 2 underwent partial palatectomy for the treatment of a malignant
palatal tumor (Figure 2A). The thermoplastic
prosthesis was designed and secured to the alveolar ridge by means of dental
wires (Figure 2B). The patient regained
oral alimentation in 48 hours and had speech quality comparable to her preoperative
speech.
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. A, Partial palatectomy for a malignant
tumor. B, Prosthesis fabricated intraoperatively from thermoplastic dressing
(Aquaplast; WFR/Aquaplast Corporation, Wyckoff, NJ) is secured to the alveolar
ridge.
|
|
|
The prosthesis achieved it goals in 11 of the 12 patients. These patients
were able to achieve physiologic deglutition and phonation within 24 to 48
hours. One patient (patient 1) remained in a coma after extensive maxillary,
orbital, and skull base resection for mucormycosis. In 11 of 12 patients,
the prosthesis was removed in 4 to 12 weeks and replaced with a permanent
implant. One patient with mucormycosis died 4 weeks after surgery with the
prosthesis in place.
COMMENT
Both case histories demonstrate the ease and effectiveness of using
an intraoperatively fabricated palatal prosthesis. This method is quick, simple,
and inexpensive and requires no special expertise and equipment. It allows
adequate and rapid oral food intake. The quality of speech achieved is comparable
to preoperative speech.
After submitting our manuscript, a recent article in the literature
showed a similar technique.6
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication January 24, 2001.
Presented at the annual meeting of the American Head and Neck Society,
Fifth International Head and Neck Conference, San Francisco, Calif, July 30,
2000.
Corresponding author and reprints: Mahesh Bhaya, MD, State University
of New York Health Science Center at Brooklyn, 450 Clarkson Ave, Campus Box
126, Brooklyn, NY 11203.
From the Department of Otolaryngology, State University of New York
Health Science Center at Brooklyn. The authors have no relationship with the
manufacturer mentioned in this article.
REFERENCES
 |  |
1. Davison SP, Sherris DA, Meland B. An algorithm for maxillectomy defect reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:215-219.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
2. Eppley BL, Sclaroff A, Altshuler L. Thermoplastic material for intraoral stent fabrication. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1985;43:913-914.
PUBMED
3. Kane WJ, Olsen KD. Enhanced bone graft contouring for mandibular reconstruction using
intraoperatively fashioned templates. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;37:30-33.
PUBMED
4. Russell DH, Brown AR. Intraoperative fabrication of postsurgical palatal stents. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:369-370.
PUBMED
5. Har-El G. A quick and simple method of preparing a palatal stent. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;10:138-139.
6. Ducic Y. An effective, inexpensive, temporary surgical obturator following maxillectomy. Laryngoscope. 2001;111:356-358.
PUBMED
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(7):889-890.
FULL TEXT
|