 |
 |

Endoscopic Laser Cricopharyngeal Myotomy to Salvage Tracheoesophageal Voice After Total Laryngectomy
Robert W. Bastian, MD;
Kamil Muzaffar, MD
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:691-693.
ABSTRACT
Development of voice after tracheoesophageal puncture, following laryngectomy,
is sometimes hampered by spasm of the cricopharyngeal muscle. This problem
has been addressed by various means, including bougienage, botulinum toxin
injection, and open surgical division of the muscle. We believe that endoscopic
carbon dioxide laser cricopharyngeal myotomy represents a direct, simple,
and effective solution.
INTRODUCTION
The current preferred method for restoration of voice and speech after
total laryngectomy is the tracheoesophageal puncture, performed either primarily
at the time of surgery or as a secondary procedure. This widely used technique
has had a high success rate since it was first described by Singer and Blom.1 Occasionally, however, a patient does not develop
satisfactory voice, even after being fitted with the appropriately sized prosthetic
device. In this case, when xylocaine infiltration of the muscle results in
1 or 2 hours of excellent voice, spasm of the cricopharyngeal muscle is proved.
Surgeons can currently evaluate and choose from among various techniques to
relieve cricopharyngeal spasm: bougienage, botulinum toxin injection,2, 3 and cricopharyngeal myotomy.4 Although we have used all 3 techniques, cricopharyngeal
myotomy is currently our method of choice. We previously performed cricopharyngeal
myotomy as an open surgical procedure, but, more recently, we used a carbon
dioxide laser to perform the operation endoscopically, with success, in 2
patients. Marked advantages of the latter technique include ease of operation,
low risk, early restoration of voice, minimal pain, and a short hospital stay.
Because of the comparison afforded by our experience with open myotomy as
well as with botulinum toxin A (Botox) injection, the method described herein
has become our preferred initial approach and may deserve consideration by
others.
TECHNIQUE
The diagnosis of cricopharyngeal muscle spasm is suspected when a patient
fails to develop speech after an appropriate number of sessions with the speech
pathologist for fitting of the voice prosthesis and training in its use. This
diagnosis is confirmed in the office by injecting the muscle with 2% xylocaine
to induce paralysis of the cricopharyngeal muscle. When spasm is the problem,
the injection will immediately, though transiently, allow the aphonic patient
to use his or her tracheoesophageal voice. Subsequent corrective surgery is
performed with the patient under brief general anesthesia in the operating
room. After induction of anesthesia, the hypopharynx and upper esophagus are
examined with a short esophagoscope to rule out any other abnormality. Next,
the Weerda "bivalved" esophagoscope is inserted, and the bulge of the cricopharyngeal
muscle projecting anteriorly from the posterior pharyngeal wall is identified
just above the level of the tracheoesophageal puncture site.
The mucosa and muscle are divided using the microspot carbon dioxide
laser at a 2- to 4-W setting through its entire vertical extent and all the
way posterior to the areolar tissue anterior to the prevertebral fascia (Figure 1 and Figure 2). If necessary, bleeding is controlled with electrocautery.
A shortened No. 7 suction drain is placed at the wound site within the pharyngoesophageal
lumen and brought out retrograde through the nostril on one side. The drain
is removed the next day, and the patient begins a liquid diet. Discharge home
occurs on the first postoperative day within 24 hours of surgery. The patient
maintains a full liquid diet for 5 days and then advances to a regular diet,
as tolerated. Unrestricted voice use begins on the fifth postoperative day.
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Initial exposure of the cricopharyngeal
muscle bulge. The black arrowhead indicates the anterior blade of the esophagoscope;
white arrowhead, elliptically shaped esophageal lumen (with tracheoesophageal
puncture device not seen, but located just distal to this opening). The cricopharyngeal
muscle runs submucosally in the direction of the arrows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. Early in the actual myotomy. The
laser has cut through mucosa, exposing the muscle itself (arrows). This cut
will be continued until all cricopharyngeal muscle fibers have been divided,
making the effective lumen size larger and relieving the spasm that has prevented
tracheoesophageal puncture voice acquisition. See the legend for Figure 1
for explanation of arrowheads.
|
|
|
COMMENT
To date, we have used laser cricopharyngeal myotomy in 2 patients who
were referred to us for voice failure over the past few years. In each case,
the procedure was performed within 8 weeks of the laryngectomy after failure
of bougienage to restore voice and with success of lidocaine hydrochloride
infiltration. Both patients were formerly aphonic; excellent voice was restored
within 24 hours, although unrestricted use of voice was not allowed for 5
days.
Having performed many open cricopharyngeal myotomies (most primarily;
a few secondarily), we have never seen late "rejoining" of the muscle, nor
have we needed to repeat the procedure once good voice was achieved. Therefore,
it seems unlikely that the procedure will need to be repeated just because
the muscle is cut via its internal rather than external surface. The results
in our 2 cases (from no voice to excellent voice) have been sustained over
time.
Based on suboptimal results in previous patients, botulinum toxin was
not used in either of these patients. Botulinum toxin injection is certainly
an option when cricopharyngeal muscle spasm prevents voice restoration after
surgery. It would seem, however, that until such injections are made technically
routine and reliable, and unless a single injection were shown to work long
term, surgeons will want to keep other options, such as the one described
herein, alive.
There have been no complications such as dysphagia or infection, and
the diet was rapidly advanced to regular within a few days. Our patients experienced
uneventful, even "easy" recoveries. Nevertheless, in the United States in
particular, where the highly related endoscopic cricopharygeal myotomy for
Zenker diverticulum has never caught on, concern over the safety of this procedure
might be an issue. To allay these concerns, one need only consider the large
reported experience with the use of cricopharyngeal myotomy for Zenker diverticulum
or cricopharyngeal dysfunction. For example, in 1960, Dohlman and Mattsson5 described the use of endoscopic myotomy via diathermy.
In their series of 100 patients, there were no serious complications and no
deaths. In 1994, Van Overbeek6 reported his
series involving 545 patients who were surgically treated with electrocoagulation
or laser. In that group, the morbidity rate was 8% and the mortality rate
was less than 1%. These complication rates are clearly lower than would be
seen with the use of an open approach. Also, regarding potential concerns
about the safety of the cricopharyngeal myotomy, the deep planes should be
relatively sealed from dissection and healing after total laryngectomy, thereby
reducing the likelihood of deep space contamination.
It is our view that in cases in which cricopharyngeal myotomy is required
to facilitate the development of voice after laryngectomy, endoscopic division
of the muscle accomplishes the task expeditiously, safely, and economically,
with minimal pain for the patient. The tracheoesophageal puncture site can
be used for feeding tube insertion in the unlikely event of initial dysphagia
due to pain or swelling. A similar procedure has been described using the
potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser7; however,
the carbon dioxide laser is more readily available in most institutions and
is therefore more economical.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication November 14, 2000.
From the Department of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery,
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Ill.
Corresponding author and reprints: Robert W. Bastian, MD, Department
of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery, Loyola University Medical Center,
2160 S First Ave, Maywood, IL 61053.
REFERENCES
 |  |
1. Henley J, Souliere C Jr. Tracheoesophageal speech failure in the laryngectomee: the role of
constrictor myotomy. Laryngoscope. 1986;96:1016-1020.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
2. Singer MI, Blom ED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1980;89:529-533.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
3. Hoffman HT, Fischer H, Van Denmark D, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin injection after total laryngectomy. Head Neck. 1997;19:92-97.
FULL TEXT
|
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
4. Crary MA, Glowasky AL. Using botulinum toxin A to improve speech and swallowing function following
total laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:760-763.
FREE FULL TEXT
5. Dohlman G, Mattsson O. The endoscopic operation for hypopharyngeal diverticula: a roentgencinematographic
study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1960;71:744-752.
6. Van Overbeek JJM. Meditation on pathogenesis of hypopharyngeal (Zenker's) diverticulum
and a report of endoscopic treatment in 545 patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1994;103:178-185.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
7. Halvorson DJ, Kuhn FA. Tracheoesophageal speech following transmural pharyngeal myotomy with
the potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser. J Laryngol Otol. 1997;111:659-662.
WEB OF SCIENCE
| PUBMED
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Archives of OtolaryngologyHead & Neck Surgery Reader's Choice: Continuing Medical Education
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127(6):725-726.
FULL TEXT
|