You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 12, December 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Gastrointestinal Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Cyclin D1 and p53 Overexpression Predicts Multiple Primary Malignant Neoplasms of the Hypopharynx and Esophagus

Takahide Kohmura, MD; Yasuhisa Hasegawa, MD; Tetsuya Ogawa, MD; Hidehiro Matsuura, MD; Masakatsu Takahashi, MD; Noriyuki Yanagita, MD; Tsutomu Nakashima, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999;125:1351-1354.

ABSTRACT

Background  Multiple primary upper aerodigestive tract carcinomas can occur in up to 15% of patients. We have shown previously that half of the patients with multiple upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinomas are initially seen with synchronous tumors. Most metachronous squamous cell carcinomas become manifest within 3 years.

Objective  To examine the expression of 2 proteins—cyclin D1 and p53—in an attempt to predict the occurrence of multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPs).

Materials and Methods  Monoclonal antibodies to cyclin D1 (DCS-6 [dilution, 1:50], Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, Newcastle, England) and p53 (DO-7 [dilution, 1-100], Dako Corp, Carpinteria, Calif) proteins were used. Resection specimens from a total of 47 patients, 12 patients with MP and 35 patients with nonmultiple primary malignant neoplasms, were analyzed. Those in the nonmultiple primary malignant neoplasm group had longer than 3 years' follow-up to ascertain the absence of MP.

Results  Tumor overexpression of cyclin D1 was significantly associated with the development of MP (P<.01). Tumor overexpression of p53 was also frequent in patients with MP although statistical significance was not achieved. The combination of these 2 parameters was an even greater predictor of MP (P<.001).

Conclusions  Overexpression of cyclin D1 and p53 proteins was highly correlated with the development of MP. Additional studies are neccesary to confirm this finding. Immunohistochemical evaluation of primary squamous cell carcinomas for cyclin D1 and p53 overexpression may become an important fact of surgical pathologic reporting for primary upper aerodigestive tract squamous cell carcinomas.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

MULTIPLE PRIMARY squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) of the primary upper aerodigestive tract may occur in up to 15% of patients,1 especially for malignant neoplasms of the hypopharynx and esophagus.2-5 As the capability to control SCC of the head and neck has improved, the survival rate has allowed for the observation of an increased rate of multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPs). We have reported previously the frequency and sites for a series of multiple primary hypopharyngeal and esophageal SCCs; half of those cases occurred concurrently,6 but for metachronous tumors, the interval was shorter than 3 years in most cases.

Cyclin D1 and p53 tumor suppressor protein play a major role in cell cycle control. Many articles have revealed that overexpression of cyclin D1 and p53 proteins is related to a poor prognosis.7 Our goal was to investigate whether cyclin D1 and p53 overexpression could predict MPs.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

RESECTION SPECIMENS

We retrospectively examined 104 patients with hypopharyngeal SCC who underwent initial treatment at the Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan, between January 1, 1980, and May 31, 1996.6 Histological criteria for diagnosing multiple primary SCC, described by Warren and Gates,8 are as follows: (1) The neoplasms must be clearly malignant as determined by histological evaluation. (2) Each neoplasm must be geographically separate and distinct. The lesions should be separated by normal-appearing mucosa. If a second neoplasm is contiguous to the initial primary tumor or is separated by mucosa with intraepithelial neoplastic change, the 2 should be considered as confluent growths rather than multicentric carcinomas. (3) The possibility that the second neoplasm represents a metastasis should be excluded. The observation that the invasive carcinoma arises from an overlying epithelium that demonstrates a transition of carcinoma in situ to invasive carcinoma is helpful. When the separate foci have significant differences in histological features, the diagnosis of separate primary cancers is appropriate.

There were 12 patients with MP of the hypopharynx and esophagus; 7 were initially seen with synchronous tumors. In 4 of the 5 patients with metachronous tumors, the interval to the development of the second SCC was shorter than 3 years. Of the remaining 92 patients, we selected 35 patients who were followed up for longer than 3 years after having received primary treatment. This group (ie, those with nonmultiple primary malignant neoplasms [NMP]) was considered to be disease free of their primary SCC and was selected as the negative control for the MP group. All 47 patients had been operated on. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was selected for study. The resection specimens from the MP group were compared with those of the NMP group. No statistically significant differences were noted in the stage of hypopharyngeal cancer between the MP (stage I, 0 cases; stage II, 1 case; stage III, 5 cases; and stage IV, 6 cases) and NMP (stage I, 4 cases; stage II, 9 cases; stage III, 14 cases; and stage IV, 8 cases) groups.

ANTIBODIES AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STAINING

The primary antibodies used for staining were a mouse monoclonal antibody specifically for cyclin D1 protein (DCS-6 [dilution, 1:50]; Novocastra Laboratories Ltd, Newcastle, England) and a mouse monoclonal antibody specifically for p53 protein (DO-7 [dilution, 1:100]; Dako Corp, Carpinteria, Calif). Monoclonal antibody DO-7 detects nuclear accumulation of p53 that, in most cases (but not all), reflects expression of mutated p53.9-10 For immunohistochemical studies, a microwave retrieval treatment was applied to enhance the immunodetection of cyclin D1 and p53 proteins. The dewaxed and rehydrated sections were covered with citrate buffer (10 nmol/L [pH, 6]) and treated for 15 minutes at a 600-W setting of the microwave. The slides were then washed twice with a phosphate-buffered saline solution, subsequently stained with either DCS-6 or DO-7, and kept at 25°C overnight. The avidin-biotin complex procedure (ABC methods, OMNITAGS Kit; Lipshaw/Immunon, Pittsburgh, Pa) was used according to the manufacturer's directions. Only nuclear staining for cyclin D1 and p53 proteins was regarded as positive. As shown in previous reports,7, 11-12 in each specimen cyclin D1 and p53 expression were jointly scored, depending on the percentage of the nuclei staining (Table 1), by 2 of us (T.K. and T.O.) who were unaware of the clinical details. Four or more tumor fields were included in the examination. For statistical analysis, the specimens were categorized as positive or negative regardless of the degree of staining. We used the Fisher exact test to determine statistical significance, which was set at P<.05.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 1. Criteria of Immunohistochemical Staining



RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The study involved 47 samples (12 patients with MP and 35 patients with NMP) of hypopharyngeal cancer. Examples of a ++ (Table 1) staining result in cyclin D1 and p53 proteins are shown in Figure 1. Table 2 gives the results of the immunohistochemical staining by group. Immunohistochemical staining in the adjacent nontumor mucosa was almost the same as in the tumor. We classified samples ++ and + as positive and ± and – as negative (Table 1) for statistical analysis. Immunohistochemical results of cyclin D1 and p53 in the MP and NMP groups are given in Table 3. The proportion of the cyclin D1 overexpression in the MP group was significantly larger than for those in the NMP group (P<.01). The proportion of the p53 overexpression in the MP group tended to be frequent although statistical signficance was not achieved (P = .18). We compared positive cases of both cyclin D1 and p53 proteins with other cases (positive of either and negative of both) (Table 4 and Table 5). Combining both cyclin D1and p53 parameters resulted in an even greater statistical significance for predicting MP (P<.001). All positive cases of both cyclin D1 and p53 proteins were included in the MP group. Examining these positive cases of both, no statistical association was noted between amount of staining and stage of the tumor (Table 6). This shows that there is a high possibility of development of MP in the positive cases of both cyclin D1 and p53 proteins. Also, more than half of the NMP cases stained negatively for both cyclin D1 and p53. Comparing Table 3 and Table 4 indicate that clear differences exist in the predictive power of both cyclin D1 and p53 overexpression vs cyclin D1 overexpression.



View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Left, Immunohistochemical staining of cyclin D1 protein in squamous cell carcinomas of the hypopharynx. Right, Immunohistochemical staining of p53 in squamous cell carcinomas of the hypopharynx. Strong positive (++) cyclin D1 and p53 staining, respectively. See Table 1 for an explanation of the classification.



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 2. Data of Immunohistochemical Staining



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 3. Overexpression of Cyclin D1 and p53 in Multiple Primary Malignant (MP) and Nonmultiple Primary Malignant (NMP) Neoplasms



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 4. Associations of Cyclin D1 Overexpression and p53 Overexpression



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 5. Combination of Cyclin D1 and p53 Proteins*



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
Table 6. Association Between Staining and Stage in Multiple Primary Malignant Neoplasms (MP)*



COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

The occurrence of MP of the primary upper aerodigestive tract is well recognized, especially between the hypopharynx and esophagus. This has been traditionally explained by the "field cancerization effect" of generalized primary upper aerodigestive tract exposure to tobacco and alcohol. The p53 tumor suppressor gene encodes a product that blocks replication of damaged DNA by preventing entry into the S phase of the cell cycle.13 Cyclin D1 protein, the cell cycle control gene, is expressed during the G1 phase of the cell cycle7 and becomes associated with its catalytic partner cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 4 or 6.14 This association results in a serine or threonine kinase activity of cyclin D1 protein. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor complex leads to a transit through the G1 phase, and cyclin D1 expression is rate limiting in this process. Overexpression of p53 and cyclin D1 have often been reported when prognosis and metastasis are considered. Although p53 mutation analysis has been studied in the differentiation between recurrence and MP,15 no studies have correlated MP with cyclin D1 and p53 analysis. In our study, we found significant differences in cyclin D1 overexpression for the MP and NMP groups. When we combined both cyclin D1 and p53 parameters, an even greater predictive power was achieved. Bradford et al10 reported that p53 immunostaining did not correlate with the p53 mutations as detected by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Their report stated that immunohistochemistry identified p53 overexpression in some tumors with apparently normal single-strand conformation polymorphism patterns and, conversely, tumors with nonsense or frameshift mutations may not express any p53 detectable by immunohistochemistry. Actually, the relationship between p53 mutations and p53 overexpression may be more complex than previously thought.16 The hypothesis to explain these phenomena is that mutations are occurring downstream from p53, such as in WAF 1Cip 1, a 21-kd protein that is transactivated by p53 and is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases.17 Interruption of the p53 pathway could interfere with a feedback loop that regulates expressions of wild-type p53. Overexpression of p53 might indicate an abnormality of the p53 pathway, an additional possible mutation. Therefore studying 2 or more parameters of G1-S phase may be meaningful. The predictive power for both cyclin D1 and p53 overexpression was more useful when compared with the predictive power of only cyclin D1 overexpression. These facts seem to prove the advantage of using 2 parameters. Nogueira et al18 have reported that samples with cyclin D1 and p53 abnormalities had a higher TNM stage and a more advanced tumor stage although they examined the amplification of cyclin D1 and the assay for the loss of heterozygosity of p53 protein. As more findings about the G1 pathway become available, we can find a more detailed relationship between cyclin D1 and p53 proteins.

We conclude that cyclin D1 and p53 parameters are useful in predicting MP. Further studies in other cases are needed to support our results. We also should perform a prospective study to confirm the occurrence of the secondary cancer by following up cases in which both cyclin D1 and p53 overexpression occurs.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Accepted for publication August 13,1999.

Reprints: Takahide Kohmura, MD, Department of Otolaryngology, Nagoya University School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai Showaku, Nagoya 466-8560, Japan.

From the Department of Otolaryngology, Nagoya University School of Medicine (Drs Kohmura, Takahashi, Yanagita, and Nakashima), Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital (Drs Hasegawa and Matsuura), Nagoya, Japan; and Department of Otolaryngology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan (Dr Ogawa).


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Materials and methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Heyne KE, Lippman SM, Hong WK. Chemoprevention in head and neck cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1991;5:783-795. ISI | PUBMED
2. Billroth T. Die Allegemeine Chirurgishe Pathologie und Therapie, in 51 Vorlesungen. Ein Handbuch fur Studirende und Aerzte. Berlin, Germany: G Riemer; 1882:980.
3. Bruke M. Multiple primary cancers. Am J Cancer. 1936;27:316-325.
4. Gluckman JL, Crissman JD. Multicentric squamous-cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract. Head Neck Surg. 1980;3:90-96. ISI | PUBMED
5. Gluckman JL, Crissman JD. Survival rates in 548 patients with multiple neoplasms of the upper aerodigestive tract. Laryngoscope. 1983;93:71-74. ISI | PUBMED
6. Kohmura T, Hasegawa Y, Matsuura H. Multiple primary malignancies of the hypopharynx and esophagus. Paper presented at: Proceedings of World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; March 2-7, 1997; Sydney, Australia.
7. Michalides RJ, Veelen NM, Kristel PM. Overexpression of cyclin D1 indicates a poor prognosis in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:497-502. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
8. Warren S, Gates O. Multiple primary malignant tumors: a survey of the literature and statistical study. Am J Cancer. 1932;51:1358-1403.
9. Harris CC, Hollstein M. Clinical implication of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1318-1327. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Bradford CR, Zhu S, Poore J. p53 Mutation as a prognostic marker in advanced laryngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;123:605-609. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
11. Ogawa T, Hasegawa Y, Nakayama B. Relationship between anticancer drug sensitivity and expression of p53, Bcl-2 proteins. Paper presented at: Proceedings of World Congress of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery; March 2-7, 1997; Sydney, Australia.
12. Coulter LK, Wolber R, Tron VA. Site-specific comparison of p53 immunostaining in squamous cell carcinomas. Hum Pathology. 1995;26:531-533. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
13. Wood NB, Kotelnikov V, Caldarelli DD. Mutation of p53 in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck: relationship to tumor cell proliferation. Laryngoscope. 1997;107:827-833. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
14. Sherr CJ. D-type cyclins. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995;20:187-190. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
15. Gasparotto D, Maestro R, Barzan L. Recurrences and second primary tumours in the head and neck region: differentiation by p53 mutation analysis. Ann Oncol. 1995;6:933-939. FREE FULL TEXT
16. Xu L, Chen YT, Huvos AG. Overexpression of p53 protein in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck without apparent gene mutations. Diagn Mol Pathol. 1994;3:83-92. ISI | PUBMED
17. Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res. 1994;54:4855-4878. FREE FULL TEXT
18. Nogueira CP, Dolan RW, Gooey J. Inactivation of p53 and amplification of cyclin D1 correlate with clinical outcome in head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 1998;108:345-350. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Risk of multiple squamous cell carcinomas both in the esophagus and the head and neck region
Muto et al.
Carcinogenesis 2005;26:1008-1012.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.