You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 10, October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Selecting Patients for Planned Neck Dissection After Chemoradiotherapy in Regionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer—Reply

Harold Lau, MD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

The issue of planned neck dissection after chemoradiation therapy for the N2-N3 neck remains a contentious issue. My colleagues and I recognize the limitations of our retrospective analysis. Nodal diameter was analyzed in our data, and it was not predictive of recurrence after chemoradiation therapy if the patient had a CR. Extracapsular extension was not analyzed, because our patient data set contained only patients diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Patients who underwent neck dissections or nodal excisions before chemoradiation therapy were excluded from our analysis. There were too few cases involving N3 disease (n = 5) in our cohort to comment on this patient group.

We agree that there is an urgent need to standardize radiologic criteria for assessing response after chemoradiation therapy. Currently, the most promising radiologic marker for CR is a negative result on fludeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography. In a recent study published . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.