You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 10, October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Middle/ External Ear Disorders
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Does Early Surgical Intervention of Middle Ear Atelectasis Improve Long-term Results and Prevent Cholesteatoma?

James E. Saunders, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(10):1040-1044.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Hypothesis: Early Surgical intervention of middle ear atelectasis improves long-term results and prevents cholesteatoma.

BACKGROUND

Atelectasis of the tympanic membrane (TM) is a frequently encountered otologic abnormality, yet the treatment of atelectasis remains controversial. This controversy stems in part from the fact that the term atelectasis may refer to a variety of conditions that have very different clinical behavior. Some authors differentiate fibroadhesive otitis media or retraction pockets from atelectasis, whereas Buckingham1 considered these conditions to be advanced stages of atelectasis. In addition, atelectasis of the pars tensa and pars flaccida clearly have different risks and surgical treatment. To evaluate clinical outcomes, Sadé and Berco2 developed a separate staging system for pars tensa atelectasis that is widely used (Table). This grading system, however, does not account for the thickness of fibrosis or other factors that influence outcome, such as the degree of hearing loss . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PRO

CON

BOTTOM LINE

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Author Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.