You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 134 No. 10, October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Education
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Otolaryngology (Urban) Legend

The More Programs to Which You Apply, the Better the Chances of Matching

Fuad M. Baroody, MD; Jayant M. Pinto, MD; Robert M. Naclerio, MD

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(10):1038.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Two hundred eighty-eight applications, 2 resident slots, aahhh! Over the past several years, the number of applications to our program has been steadily climbing, and determining which applicants to invite for a limited number of interview spots has become increasingly challenging. An explanation for the rise in applications is the medical students' belief that applying to more programs enhances their chances of acceptance, a process simplified by the ability to submit multiple applications through an electronic, centralized match system. To determine whether the large number of applications was unique to our program or ubiquitous, we sent a Web-based survey to all 104 Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education–approved otolaryngology program directors requesting information pertaining to the match process for the 2006-2007 year.

Eighty-four program directors responded to our survey (81%). Eighty-two of these responded to the question regarding . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.