You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 9, September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Selecting From the Menu of Treatment Options for Locally Advanced Laryngeal Cancer

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:819.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Enepekides provides an excellent overall perspective of treatment options for T3 laryngeal carcinomas. He correctly concludes that patients now have a choice among several options, many of which offer the hope of preserving laryngeal function. Of greatest significance highlighted in this review is the progress made over the past decade in the treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer. Whereas most patients previously were offered a TL with its inherent loss of function, in today’s world, this is not the case. Enepekides provides a well-balanced review of the treatment spectrum, ranging from conservation surgery to various types of CRT. Also implied by this review is the inherent preference that exists among oncologists for certain treatment approaches, and such preferences tend to be country and institution related. Much of the credit for the treatment advances in laryngeal cancer should go to our colleagues in radiation and medical oncology and to head and neck . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

K. Thomas Robbins, MD
Author Affiliations: Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy as the Most Appropriate Treatment for Most T3 Laryngeal Carcinomas
Danny J. Enepekides
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(9):815-818.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concurrent Chemoradiation as a Treatment Option for Advanced-Stage Laryngeal Cancers
Russell B. Smith
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(9):820.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.