You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 9, September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laryngology/ Speech/ Language Pathology
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy as the Most Appropriate Treatment for Most T3 Laryngeal Carcinomas

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:815-818.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Hypothesis: Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the most appropriate first-line treatment for most T3 laryngeal carcinomas.

BACKGROUND

Prior to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Laryngeal Cancer Study Group’s prospective randomized organ preservation trial,1 the standard of care for most T3 laryngeal carcinomas was total laryngectomy (TL) and postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Along with the introduction of nonoperative organ-preserving treatment strategies came an extensive and ongoing debate on the most appropriate treatment for advanced laryngeal carcinoma. Both the VA laryngeal study1 and subsequent European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial2 for hypopharyngeal carcinoma demonstrated that neoadjuvant CRT, compared with TL and postoperative radiotherapy, allowed preservation of the larynx in 50% to 64% of patients without compromising survival. Neither of these studies included a radiotherapy-only arm, bringing into question the true role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This led to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 91-11 trial3 that compared radiation only . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PROS

CONS

BOTTOM LINE

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Danny J. Enepekides, MD
Author Affiliations: Departments of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, Calif, and Northern California VA Medical Center, Mather Field, Calif.


RELATED ARTICLES

Selecting From the Menu of Treatment Options for Locally Advanced Laryngeal Cancer
K. Thomas Robbins
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(9):819.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Concurrent Chemoradiation as a Treatment Option for Advanced-Stage Laryngeal Cancers
Russell B. Smith
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(9):820.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.