This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Facial Plastic Surgery  • Trauma/ Maxillofacial Surgery  • Oral/ Maxillofacial Trauma  • Alert me on articles by topic

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131:170-171.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Murr has provided an excellent discussion of the fundamental concepts of treating fractures of the angle of the mandible as well as discussing arguments in favor of and against several commonly used techniques. His comments are well-founded.

Figure appears in full text version. Kris S. Moe, MD

The decision algorithm used in the treatment of craniofacial fractures is quite complex. The first consideration is whether any treatment is required. If so, one must decide whether the reduction should be performed in an open or closed approach. A decision on what type of repair to undertake must be made, considering external vs internal fixation and fracture immobilization vs rigid fixation. If rigid fixation is chosen, one must choose between lag screws and compression and noncompression plating.

Figure appears in full text version. Alisha West, MS

Fractures of the angle of the mandible are located posterior to the second molar in the triangle of bone between the horizontal and ascending rami. As Murr points . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Kris S. Moe, MD; Alisha West, MS

RELATED ARTICLES

Mandibular Angle Fractures and Noncompression Plating Techniques
Andrew H. Murr
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(2):166-168.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Miniplate Repair of Mandibular Angle Fractures
E. Bradley Strong
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;131(2):169-170.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT