You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 2, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Education
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Truth and Consequences of the New Duty Requirements

A Resident's Perspective

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:137-138.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

This year, our institution restructured its residency programs in 57 specialties and subspecialties to fully comply with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) work hour restrictions,1 which went into effect July 1, 2003. Since then, the regulations have had a profound and widespread impact on the delivery of health care in the surgical specialties at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The restrictions were implemented by the ACGME to "strengthen both patient care and [resident] education."2 While these restrictions have had beneficial effects, in some cases the effect has been different from what was intended by the ACGME.

The ACGME restrictions have brought about positive changes. In congruence with institutions nationwide, our surgical interns and junior residents have favored the new duty hours standard.3 Primarily, they cite the enhanced quality of their personal and family lives and increased control of their lifestyles. These are not trivial . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Subinoy Das, MD
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
(e-mail: sdas2@unch.unc.edu)



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The Future of Otolaryngology Is Now
Welsh
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004;130:1451-1451.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.