You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 12, December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Selective Neck Dissection for Cervical Metastasis

What Do We Really Know?

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1435.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

One aspect of major emphasis in the realm of the surgical treatment of patients with head and neck cancer has been the application of more tissue-preserving procedures to reduce, as much as possible, disease-related morbidity. The appropriate use of such procedures requires that, when performed, they provide a level of cancer control equivalent, or very nearly so, to the traditional, more radical operations. A facet of management that has drawn considerable attention in this regard for many years is how to best manage cervical lymph node metastasis.


 
Figure appears in full text version.
Robert P. Zitsch III, MD


Recently, the suitability of SND instead of MRND for the elective treatment of the cN0 neck has been a prominently debated topic, which, 6 years ago, was the focus of this section in an issue of the ARCHIVES.1 The leading opinions then expressed were that, although conclusive, prospective data comparing the 2 procedures were not available . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Robert P. Zitsch III, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Is Selective Neck Dissection Adequate Treatment for Node-Positive Disease?
Christine G. Gourin
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(12):1431-1434.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Neck Dissection Is an Option for Early Node-Positive Disease
Carol R. Bradford
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(12):1436.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.