 |
 |

Selective Neck Dissection for Cervical Metastasis
What Do We Really Know?
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1435.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
One aspect of major emphasis in the realm of the surgical treatment of patients with head and neck cancer has been the application of more tissue-preserving procedures to reduce, as much as possible, disease-related morbidity. The appropriate use of such procedures requires that, when performed, they provide a level of cancer control equivalent, or very nearly so, to the traditional, more radical operations. A facet of management that has drawn considerable attention in this regard for many years is how to best manage cervical lymph node metastasis.
Figure appears in full text version.
|
|
|
|
|
Recently, the suitability of SND instead of MRND for the elective treatment of the cN0 neck has been a prominently debated topic, which, 6 years ago, was the focus of this section in an issue of the ARCHIVES.1 The leading opinions then expressed were that, although conclusive, prospective data comparing the 2 procedures were not available . . . [Full Text of this Article]
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Robert P. Zitsch III, MD
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Is Selective Neck Dissection Adequate Treatment for Node-Positive Disease?
Christine G. Gourin
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(12):1431-1434.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Selective Neck Dissection Is an Option for Early Node-Positive Disease
Carol R. Bradford
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(12):1436.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|