You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 130 No. 12, December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Challenges in Otolaryngology
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Oncology
 •Head & Neck Cancer
 •Neoplasms of Head & Neck
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is Selective Neck Dissection Adequate Treatment for Node-Positive Disease?

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1431-1434.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Hypothesis: Selective neck dissection (SND) is adequate treatment for node-positive neck disease.

BACKGROUND

Selective neck dissection, or the selective removal of nodal groups at risk for harboring cervical metastases, is an extension of the concept of the functional neck dissection first introduced in the 1960s. Until 1963, radical neck dissection (RND) was the standard surgical treatment of the cervical lymphatic nodes. In 1963 Suarez proposed a conservative, functional approach to neck dissection that was popularized by Bocca et al.1 These authors described the removal of cervical lymph nodes from levels I through V with their enveloping fascial sheath while sparing nonlymphatic anatomic structures adjacent to, but not containing, lymph nodes, such as the accessory nerve, internal jugular vein, and sternocleidomastoid muscle.1 The resulting modified RND (MRND) has been shown to avoid the cosmetic and functional morbidity associated with the classic RND without compromising oncologic safety or efficacy as a staging and . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PRO

CON

BOTTOM LINE

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Christine G. Gourin, MD
Author Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Medical College of Georgia, Augusta.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Selective Neck Dissection for Cervical Metastasis: What Do We Really Know?
Robert P. Zitsch, III
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(12):1435.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Selective Neck Dissection Is an Option for Early Node-Positive Disease
Carol R. Bradford
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(12):1436.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.