This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related articles  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Facial Plastic Surgery  • Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery, Other  • Dermatology  • Alert me on articles by topic

Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:1333-1334.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The article by Carniol and Greene clearly demonstrates the dilemma faced by the practicing facial plastic and head and neck surgeon who incorporates laser and nonlaser technology into the practice of facial rejuvenation and reconstruction. To assign the appropriate technology to skin and facial pathology is indeed a perplexing issue for both the novice and the experienced surgeon. The quest for perfection in today’s society, including the desire for minimal wounding and maximal results, stands as a formidable task in a market-driven environment.

Figure appears in full text version. Jim E. Gilmore, MD

Carniol and Greene provide an overview of the various technologies and instruments in the field and their relative values. This overview is enhanced by an excellent bibliographic database for further study and research. The authors further clarify the necessity of appropriate skill, training, and knowledge in the application of the nonlaser, laser (ablative vs nonablative), and radiofrequency devices and the need for independent . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Jim E. Gilmore, MD

RELATED ARTICLES

What Are the Optimal Techniques for Skin Rejuvenation?
Paul J. Carniol and Brad A. Greene
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(11):1328-1333.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Proven Modalities for Facial Skin Resurfacing?
Stephen W. Perkins
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130(11):1334-1335.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT